Evolution, Old & New: Or, the Theories of Buffon, Dr. Erasmus Darwin and Lamarck,; as compared with that of Charles DarwinButler, Samuel
Philosophy
Evolution, Old & New: Or, the Theories of Buffon, Dr. Erasmus Darwin and Lamarck,; as compared with that of Charles Darwin
Butler, Samuel
Evolution (Biology) -- History
"Thus, besides a kind of taste at the extremity of their roots, similar
to that of the extremities of our lacteal vessels, for the purpose of
selecting their proper food, and besides different kinds of irritability
residing in the various glands, which separate honey, wax, resin, and
other juices from their blood; vegetable life seems to possess an organ
of sense to distinguish the variations of heat, another to distinguish
the varying degrees of moisture, another of light, another of touch, and
probably another analogous to our sense of smell. To these must be added
the indubitable evidence of their passion of love, and I think we may
truly conclude that they are furnished with a common sensorium for each
bud, and that they must occasionally repeat those perceptions, either in
their dreams or waking hours, and consequently possess ideas of so many
of the properties of the external world, and of their own
existence."[168]
FOOTNOTES:
[155] 'Origin of Species,' note on p. xiv.
[156] 'Zoonomia,' vol. i. p. 170.
[157] Miss Seward's 'Memoirs,' &c., p. 491.
[158] See p. 116 of this volume.
[159] 'Zoonomia,' vol. i. p. 184.
[160] 'Zoonomia,' p. 171.
[161] 'Zoonomia,' p. 187.
[162] 'Nature,' March 14 and 21, 1878.
[163] See 'Botanic Garden,' part ii., note on Silene.
[164] 'On the Digestive Powers of Plants.' See Mr. Francis Darwin's
lecture, already referred to.
[165] See 'Botanic Garden, part i., add. note, p. xxxix.
[166] Ibid., part ii., art. "Vallisneria."
[167] See 'Botanic Garden,' part i. cant 3, l. 440.
[168] 'Zoonomia,' vol. i. p. 107.
CHAPTER XIV.
FULLER QUOTATIONS FROM THE 'ZOONOMIA.'
The following are the passages in the 'Zoonomia' which have the most
important bearing on evolution:--
"The ingenious Dr. Hartley, in his work on man, and some other
philosophers have been of opinion, that our immortal part acquires
during this life certain habits of action or of sentiment which become
for ever indissoluble, continuing after death in a future state of
existence; and add that if these habits are of the malevolent kind, they
must render their possessor miserable even in Heaven. I would apply this
ingenious idea to the generation or production of the embryon or new
animal, which partakes so much of the form and propensities of its
parent.
"_Owing to the imperfection of language the offspring is termed a new
animal, but is in truth a branch or elongation of the parent, since a
part of the embryon-animal is, or was, a part of the parent, and
therefore in strict language, cannot be said to be entirely new at the
time of its production; and, therefore, it may retain some of the habits
of the parent system._
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account