Excursions to Cairo, Jerusalem, Damascus, and Balbec From the United States Ship Delaware, During Her Recent Cruise: With an Attempt to Discriminate Between Truth and Error in Regard to the Sacred Places of the Holy CityJones, George
History
Excursions to Cairo, Jerusalem, Damascus, and Balbec From the United States Ship Delaware, During Her Recent Cruise: With an Attempt to Discriminate Between Truth and Error in Regard to the Sacred Places of the Holy City
Jones, George
Middle East -- Description and travel
The opening or outlet of the valley of Tyropœon, or the Cheesemongers,
still remains, and is very distinct. The ground begins to decline into
it as soon as we leave the court of the mosque of Omar, advancing
southward; and at the distance of about 400 feet we come to its lowest
part, and the spot where it is lost in the valley of Kedron. This
opening is opposite a mountain, called now the Mount of Offence, but
styled by Josephus “that other hill,” and described by him as just
south of the Mount of Olives. A short distance up this valley we come
to an oblong pool sunk partly in the ground, and walled on three sides,
the fourth being broken down; it is called the Pool of Siloam, and very
probably occupies the site of the ancient pool of that name noticed in
the Scriptures. A few hundred feet above this pool the valley enters
the modern city, and I believe cannot be traced any further. There can
be no doubt that it is the ancient Tyropœon, and we thus get a portion
of the northern boundary of Mount _Zion_.[26]
Mount Zion had on the east the valley of Kedron, and on the south and
west the valley of Hinnom,[27] or Gehenna, and these boundaries are now
just as described by Josephus, except that the sides of the valleys
towards the city are now rendered sloping by the vast quantities
of debris or loose stuff from the ancient city, instead of being
perpendicular as they were in ancient times. That of Hinnom, on its
southern and western sides, still presents that appearance, a bold
perpendicular precipice, which it would be impossible to scale. This
valley is described by Strabo (lib. xvi.) as having a depth of 60 feet
and a width of 250, which are pretty nearly its present dimensions. The
wall of the ancient city was built on the edge of the precipice, and,
according to Tacitus, was, in the parts thus guarded by nature, 60 feet
in height; on the northern side of Jerusalem, where the ground offered
fewer advantages, it had the prodigious elevation of 120 feet.[28] It
was built in a crooked or zigzag line, “so that they might flank the
besiegers and cast darts on them sideways.”[29]
We have thus far had what sailors call plain sailing, for no one can
easily be at a loss as regards the eastern, southern, and a portion of
the western boundaries of the ancient Jerusalem. The northern limits
offer a subject of greater difficulty, and it is one also of greater
importance, for on this depends the question whether the spot pointed
out as Mount Calvary be really the place of the crucifixion or not. The
objectors, including almost all Protestant visitors, say it is not and
cannot be, since this spot was evidently within the ancient city; and
both from the Scriptures, and from the well-known custom of the Jews
on such occasions, we know that this event occurred without the walls.
This subject we will now examine.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account