Experiences of a Dug-out, 1914-1918Callwell, C. E. (Charles Edward), Sir
History
Experiences of a Dug-out, 1914-1918
Callwell, C. E. (Charles Edward), Sir
World War, 1914-1918 -- Great Britain
Sir Ian complained to the Dardanelles Commission that no preliminary
scheme of operations had been drawn up by the War Office; and he
certainly got little assistance in that direction, although it might
not have been of much use to him if he had.[4] He also complained that
there was a great want of staff preparation, no arrangements for
water, for instance, having been made. This was in effect the
consequence of the General Staff at this time not exercising its
proper functions or being invested with the powers to which it was
entitled. There never was a meeting of the various directors in the
War Office concerned, under the aegis of the General Staff, to go into
these matters in detail. The troops would certainly be called upon to
land somewhere, sooner or later, whether the fleet forced the
Dardanelles or not, and all the arrangements as regards supplies,
transport, water, hospitals, material for piers, etc., required to be
worked out by those responsible after getting a lead from the General
Staff. If the commodities of all kinds involved could not be procured
locally or in Egypt, then it was up to the War Office to see that
they should be sent out from home, and be sent out, moreover,
practically at the same time as the troops left so that they should be
on the spot when needed.
[Footnote 4: A single "preliminary scheme of
operations" would have been of little service to
the C.-in-C. of "Medforce"--it must have been based
on the mistaken assumption (which held good when he
started) that the fleet would force the Straits,
and it would consequently have concerned itself
with undertakings totally different from those
which, in the event, Sir Ian had to carry out. If
the army was to derive any benefit from projects
elaborated in the War Office, there must have been
a second "preliminary scheme of operations" based
on the assumption that the fleet was going to fail.
What profit is there in a plan of campaign that
dictates procedure to be followed after the first
great clash of arms? In the case under
consideration, the first great clash of arms befell
on the 18th of March, five days after Sir Ian left
London with his instructions, and it turned the
whole business upside down.]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account