Experiments and Considerations Touching Colours (1664)Boyle, Robert
History
Experiments and Considerations Touching Colours (1664)
Boyle, Robert
Color -- Early works to 1800; Colors -- Early works to 1800
Seventeenthly, Finding that by Rubbing the Stone with the Flat side
downwards, I did by reason of the Opacity of the Ring; and the sudden Decay
of Light upon the ceasing of the Attrition, probably lose the sight of the
Stones greatest Vividness; and supposing that the Commotion made in one
part of the stone will be easily propagated all over, I sometimes held the
piece of Cloath upon which I rubb'd it, so, that one side of the Stone was
exposed to my Eye, whilst I was rubbing the other, whereby it appear'd more
Vivid than formerly, and to make Luminous Tracts by its Motions too and
fro. And sometimes holding the Stone upwards, I rubb'd its Broad side with
a fine smooth piece of Transparent Horn, by which means the Light through
that Diaphanous Substance, did whilst I was actually rubbing the Stone,
appear so Brisk that sometimes and in some places it seem'd to have little
Sparks of fire.
Eighteenthly, I took also a piece of flat Blew Glass, and having rubb'd the
Diamond well upon a Cloath, and nimbly clapt the Glass upon it, to try
whether in case the Light could peirce it, it would by appearing Green, or
of some other Colour than Blew, assist me to guess whether it self were
sincere or no. But finding the Glass impervious to so faint a Light, I then
thought it fit to try whether that hard Bodies would not by Attrition
increase the Diamonds Light so as to become penetrable thereby, and
accordingly when I rubb'd the Glass briskly upon the Stone, I found the
Light to be Conspicuous enough, and somewhat Dy'd in its passage, but found
it not easie to give a Name to the Colour it exhibited.
Lastly, To comply with the Suspition I had upon the whole Matter, that the
chief manifest Change wrought in the Stone, was by Compression of its
parts, rather than Incalescence, I took a piece of white Tile well Glaz'd,
and if I press'd the Stone hard against it, it seem'd though I did not rub
it to and fro, to shine at the Sides: And however it did both very
manifestly and vigorously Shine, if whilst I so press'd it, I mov'd it any
way upon the Surface of the Tile, though I did not make it draw a Line of
above a quarter of an Inch long, or thereabouts. And though I made it not
move to and fro, but only from one end of the short Line to the other,
without any return or Lateral motion. Nay, after it had been often rubb'd,
and suffer'd to lose its Light again, not only it seem'd more easie to be
excited than at the beginning of the Night; but if I did press hard upon it
with my Finger, at the very instant that I drew it briskly off, it would
disclose a very Vivid but exceeding short Liv'd Splendour, not to call it a
little Coruscation.[42] So that a _Cartesian_ would scarce scruple to think
he had found in this Stone no slight Confirmation of his Ingenious Masters
_Hypothesis_, touching the Generation of Light in Sublunary Bodies, not
sensibly Hot.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account