"The Act of 1876 expressly forbids its use as an anæsthetic.
When it is used, it must be supplemented with some other drug to
relieve pain. A good deal of misconception exists as to the
actual physiological effect of curare. Claude Bernard believed
that it did not in any way affect the sensory nerves, and he
described in theatrical terms the animal as being unable to
stir, but suffering horrible torture. It is pretty certainly
known now that Claude Bernard was wrong, and that, though curare
acts first upon the motor nerves, it also, though less rapidly,
paralyses the sensory nerves.... Probably the truth is, that,
like all other nerve-poisons, the effect of curare varies with
the dose. The muscular nerves are the first affected, then the
sensory, and finally the central nervous system. As a matter of
fact, however, morphia or some other narcotic is always given in
addition to curare when it is used in laboratory work in
England."
III.--LATEST REPORT (1905) OF INSPECTORS UNDER THE ACT
(The various tables of names, places, &c., and the references to them,
which are contained in this Report, need not be reprinted here. The
Report, and other papers relating to the Act, may be bought for a few
pence from Wyman & Sons, Ltd., Fetter Lane, E.C.)
* * * * *
ENGLAND AND SCOTLAND
_April 17th, 1906._
SIR,--I have the honour to submit the following Report on Experiments
performed in England and Scotland during the Year 1905, under the Act
39 & 40 Vict. c. 77.... Six new places were registered for the
performance of experiments, and one place was removed from the
register during the year. All licensees were restricted to the
registered place or places specified on their licenses, with the
exception of those who were permitted to perform inoculation
experiments in places other than a "registered place," with the object
of studying outbreaks of disease occurring in remote districts or
under circumstances which render it impracticable to perform the
experiment in a "registered place."
The total number of licensees was 381. Reports have been furnished by
(or, in a few exceptional cases, on behalf of) these licensees in the
form required by the Secretary for State. The reports show that 122
licensees performed no experiments. The numbers given above include 22
licensees whose licences expired on February 28, 1905, and who
returned no experiments in 1905.
Tables I., II., and III. afford evidence,--
1. That licences and certificates have been granted and allowed
only upon the recommendation of persons of high scientific
standing;
2. That the licensees are persons who, by their training and
education, are fitted to undertake experimental work and to
profit by it;
3. That all experimental work has been conducted in suitable
places.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account