Expositor's Bible: The Gospel of MatthewGibson, John Monro
Religion
Expositor's Bible: The Gospel of Matthew
Gibson, John Monro
Bible. Matthew -- Criticism, interpretation, etc.
It would be beyond belief, were it not so sadly familiar a fact, that
some, professing honestly to interpret this passage, resolve the
answer of the apostle into little or nothing more than the popular
idea, as if the Sonship here referred to were only what any prophet or
righteous man might claim. He surely must be wilfully blind who does
not see that the apostolic answer which the Lord accepts is wide as
the poles from the popular notions He so decisively rejects; and this
is made peculiarly emphatic by the striking words with which the true
answer is welcomed--the Saviour's first personal beatitude (as if to
suggest, His is the kingdom of heaven--cf. Matt. v. 3, 10): "Blessed
art thou, Simon Bar-jona: for flesh and blood hath not revealed it
unto thee, but My Father which is in heaven." It will be remembered
that, in asserting His own personal relation to the Father, Christ had
said: "No man knoweth the Son, but the Father; neither knoweth any man
the Father, save the Son, and he to whomsoever the Son will reveal
Him" (xi. 27); and now that to one at least the Father has been
revealed in the Son, He recognises the fact with joy. These notions of
the people about Him were but earth-born notions, the surmisings of
"flesh and blood": this faith of the true apostle was born from above;
it could have come only from heaven.
Now at last, therefore, the foundation is laid, and the building of
the spiritual temple is begun. The words which follow (ver. 18) are
quite natural and free from most, if not from all, the difficulties in
which perverse human ingenuity has entangled them, if only we bear in
mind the circumstances and surroundings. The little group is standing
on one of the huge rocky flanks of mighty Hermon, great boulders here
and there around them; and in all probability, well in sight, some
great stones cut out of the rock and made ready for use in building,
like those still to be seen in the neighbourhood of Baalbec, to the
north of Hermon; for this region was famous for its great temples.
Now, when we remember that the two words our Lord uses (πέτρος and
πέτρα) for "rock" in our version have not precisely the same
meaning--the one (Petros, Peter) signifying a piece of rock, a stone,
the other (Petra) suggesting rather the great bed-rock out of which
these stones are cut and on which they are lying--we can understand
that, while the reference is certainly in the first place to Peter
himself, the main thing is the great fact just brought out that he is
resting, in the strength of faith, on God as revealed in His Son.
Thus, while Peter is certainly the piece of rock, the first stone
which is laid upon the great underlying foundation on which all the
faithful build, and therefore is in a sense--the common popular sense,
in fact--the foundation stone, yet the foundation of all is the
Bed-Rock, on which the first stone and all other stones are laid.
Bearing this well in mind, we further see that there is no
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account