Expositor's Bible: The Gospel of MatthewGibson, John Monro
Religion
Expositor's Bible: The Gospel of Matthew
Gibson, John Monro
Bible. Matthew -- Criticism, interpretation, etc.
"By what authority doest Thou these things? And who gave Thee this
authority?" The question was fair enough; and if it had been asked in
an earnest spirit, Jesus would have given then, as always to the
honest inquirer, a kind and satisfying answer. It is not, however, as
inquirers, but as cavillers, they approach Him. Again and again, at
times and in ways innumerable, by fulfilment of prophecy, by His
mighty deeds and by His wondrous words, He had given proof of His
Divine authority and established His claim to be the true Messiah. It
was not therefore because they lacked evidence of His authority, but
because they hated it, because they would not have this man to reign
over them, that now they question Him. It was obvious that their only
object was to entangle Him; accordingly our Lord showed how in the net
they were spreading for Him their own feet were caught.
He meets their question with a counter question, "The baptism of John,
whence was it? from heaven, or of men?" The more we examine this
question, the more must we admire the consummate wisdom it displays.
We see at once how it turns the tables on His critics; but it is far
more important to notice how admirably adapted it was to lead them to
the answer of their own question, if only they would follow it out.
They dared not repudiate the baptism of John; and had not John
baptised Jesus, and solemnly borne repeated testimony to His
Messiahship? Had he not most emphatically borne that very testimony to
a formal deputation sent by themselves? (John i. 19-27). Finally, were
not the ministry and testimony of John closely associated in prophecy
with that very coming of the Lord to His Temple which gave them so
deep offence: "Behold, I will send My messenger, and he shall prepare
the way before Me: and the Lord, whom ye seek, shall suddenly come to
His temple: ... behold, He shall come, saith the Lord of hosts." Our
Lord's counter question, then, was framed with such exquisite skill as
to disappoint their malice, while at the same time it was suited to
guide the earnest inquirer to the truth.
The propounders of the question were not true men, but hypocrites. A
negative answer they _could_ not give. An affirmative they
_would_ not give. So when they refused to answer, our Lord
replied, "Neither tell I you by what authority I do these things."
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account