Expositor's Bible: The Gospel of MatthewGibson, John Monro
Religion
Expositor's Bible: The Gospel of Matthew
Gibson, John Monro
Bible. Matthew -- Criticism, interpretation, etc.
Had the series ended with the raising of the daughter of Jairus, it
had been made sufficiently apparent that Christ was able and willing
to raise the dead; but it had still remained unrevealed by what means
a man spiritually dead could secure for himself the resurrection of
his lost spiritual powers. Now it is clear. The death of the spirit is
parallel, not to the total death of the damsel, but to the partial
death of the blind; for though the spirit of a man be dead, his mind
remains alive, his heart too, his conscience even, and his body of
course; there remains enough of him, so to speak, to imitate the
example of these two blind men, to ask the Son of David for mercy, to
follow Him till he finds it, to allow Him first to draw out the
dormant faculty of faith, and then, having prepared him for the mighty
boon, to pour celestial light upon his soul, bestowing on him a life
so new and fresh and blessed, that it will seem to him as if it were,
and it will in point of spiritual fact really be, life from the dead.
It seems more than likely that it was because He wished to subordinate
the physical to the spiritual that He strictly charged them, saying,
"See that no man know it." If the main thing had been the restoration
of bodily sight, the more who heard of it the better. But His great
purpose was far higher,--even to put an end to spiritual blindness and
death; therefore He must limit His dealings with natural blindness to
those who were prepared to receive the lower blessing without injuring
them in their higher nature; and to make known such a case in the way
of advertisement through the country-side would have been to descend
from His lofty position as Saviour of men and Herald of the kingdom of
heaven to that of oculist for the neighbourhood. But, though we can
readily see why the Saviour should forbid the publication of the
cure, it was natural enough that the men should disobey the order.
They probably attributed His injunction to modesty, and thought they
were showing a proper appreciation of what had been done for them by
publishing it abroad. Blameworthy they certainly were; but not
inexcusable.
The other case--the cure of the dumb demoniac--comes, if possible,
still closer to the spiritual condition with which it was the work of
the Saviour especially to deal. Like the former, it was the loss of a
faculty; but, unlike it, it was not the natural loss of it, but the
eclipsing of it by the malign presence of a spirit of evil. How
closely parallel is this to the case of the spiritually dead. What is
it that has destroyed the great faculty by which God is known and
worshipped? Is it not sin? Let that demon be cast out, and not only
will the eye see, but the tongue will speak; there will be a new song
in the mouth, even praise to the Most High.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account