Can it smell? Everything tells us that it cannot. Scent is of
assistance in the search for food. But the Capricorn-grub need not go
in quest of eatables. It feeds on its home; it lives on the wood that
gives it shelter. Nevertheless I tested it. In a log of fresh cypress
wood I made a groove of the same width as that of the natural
galleries, and I placed the grub inside it. Cypress wood is strongly
scented; it has the smell characteristic of most of the pine family.
This resinous scent, so strange to a grub that lives always in oak,
ought to vex it, to trouble it; and it should show its displeasure by
some kind of commotion, some attempt to get away. It did nothing of the
kind: once it had found the right position in the groove it went to the
end, as far as it could go, and made no further movement. Then I set
before it, in its usual channel, a piece of camphor. Again no effect.
Camphor was followed by naphthaline. Still no result. I do not think I
am going too far when I deny the creature a sense of smell.
Taste is there no doubt. But such taste! The food is without variety:
oak, for three years at a stretch, and nothing else. What can the
grub’s palate find to enjoy in this monotonous fare? The agreeable
sensation of a fresh piece, oozing with sap; the uninteresting flavour
of an over-dry piece. These, probably, are the only changes in the
meal.
There remains the sense of touch, the universal passive sense common to
all live flesh that quivers under the goad of pain. The Capricorn-grub,
therefore, is limited to two senses, those of taste and touch, and both
of these it possesses only in a very small degree. It is very little
better off than Condillac’s statue. The imaginary being created by the
philosopher had one sense only, that of smell, equal in delicacy to our
own; the real being, the oak-eater has two, which are inferior even
when put together to the one sense of the statue. The latter plainly
perceived the scent of a rose, and clearly distinguished it from any
other.
A vain wish has often come to me in my dreams: to be able to think, for
a few minutes, with the brain of my Dog, or to see the world with the
eyes of a Gnat. How things would change in appearance! But they would
change much more if understood only with the intellect of the grub.
What has that incomplete creature learnt through its senses of touch
and taste? Very little; almost nothing. It knows that the best bits of
wood have a special kind of flavour, and that the sides of a passage,
when not carefully smoothed, are painful to the skin. This is the limit
of its wisdom. In comparison with this, the statue with the sensitive
nostrils was a marvel of knowledge. It remembered, compared, judged,
and reasoned. Can the Capricorn-grub remember? Can it reason? I
described it a little time ago as a bit of intestine that crawls about.
This description gives an answer to these questions. The grub has the
sensations of a bit of intestine, no more and no less.
III
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account