The blocks in Fig. 15 are subject to a marked fluctuation. Now the
black surfaces represent the bottoms of the blocks, all pointing
downward and to the left, and now the black surfaces have changed
and have become the tops, pointing upward and to the right. For some
the changes come at will; for others they seem to come unexpectedly,
but all are aided by anticipating mentally the nature of the
transformation. The effect here is quite striking, the blocks seeming
almost animated and moving through space. In Fig. 16 a similar
arrangement serves to create an illusion as to the real number of
blocks present. If viewed in one way--the black surface forming the
tops of the blocks--there seem to be six, arranged as in Fig. 17;
but when the transformation has taken place and the black surfaces
have become the overhanging bottoms of the boxes, there are seven,
arranged as in Fig. 18. Somewhat different, but still belonging to
the group of ambiguous figures, is the ingenious conceit of the
duck-rabbit shown in Fig. 19. When it is a rabbit, the face looks
to the right and a pair of ears are conspicuous behind; when it is
a duck, the face looks to the left and the ears have been changed
into the bill. Most observers find it difficult to hold either
interpretation steadily, the fluctuations being frequent, and coming
as a surprise.
[Illustration: FIG. 16.
FIG. 16_a_.
FIG. 16_b_.
FIGS. 16, 16_a_, and 16_b_.--How many blocks are
there in this pile? Six or seven? Note the change in
arrangement of the blocks as they change in number
from six to seven. This change is described in the
text. Figs. 16_a_ and 16_b_ show the two phases of a
group of any three of the blocks. The arrangement of
a pyramid of six blocks seems the more stable and is
usually first suggested; but hold the page inverted,
and you will probably see the alternate arrangement
(with, however, the black surfaces still forming the
tops). And once knowing what to look for, you will very
likely be able to see either arrangement, whether the
diagram be held inverted or not. This method of viewing
the figures upside down and in other positions is also
suggested to bring out the changes indicated in Figs.
12, 12_a_, 12_b_, and in Figs. 14, 14_a_, 14_b_.]
IV
[Illustration: FIG. 17.
FIG. 18.
T indicates that the shaded portion of Fig. 16 in this
view represents the top of a block; B that in the other
view it represents the bottom.]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account