Fancies Versus FadsChesterton, G. K. (Gilbert Keith)
General
Fancies Versus Fads
Chesterton, G. K. (Gilbert Keith)
English essays -- 20th century
freedom, seeking to found a newer and freer state beyond the sea, and
thus becoming the origin and model of modern democracy. All this
betrays a lack of exactitude. It is certainly nearer to exact truth to
say that Merlin built the castle at Camelot by magic, or that Roland
broke the mountains in pieces with his unbroken sword.
For at least the old fables are faults on the right side. They are
symbols of the truth and not of the opposite of the truth. They
described Roland as brandishing his unbroken sword against the Moslems,
but not in favour of the Moslems. And the New England Puritans would
have regarded the establishment of real religious liberty exactly as
Roland would have regarded the establishment of the religion of Mahound.
The fables described Merlin as building a palace for a king and not a
public hall for the London School of Economics. And it would be quite as
sensible to read the Fabian politics of Mr. Sidney Webb into the local
kingships of the Dark Ages, as to read anything remotely resembling
modern liberality into the most savage of all the savage theological
frenzies of the seventeenth century. Thus the “Mayflower” is not merely
a fable, but is much more false than fables generally are. The revolt of
the Puritans against the Stuarts was really a revolt _against_ religious
toleration. I do not say the Puritans were never persecuted by their
opponents; but I do say, to their great honour and glory, that the
Puritans never descended to the hypocrisy of pretending for a moment
that they did not mean to persecute their opponents. And in the main
their quarrel with the Stuarts was that the Stuarts would not persecute
those opponents enough. Not only was it then the Catholics who were
proposing toleration, but it was they who had already actually
established toleration in the State of Maryland, before the Puritans
began to establish the most intolerant sort of intolerance in the State
of New England. And if the fable is fabulous touching the emancipation
of religion, it is yet more fabulous touching the expansion of empire.
That had been started long before either New England or Maryland, by
Raleigh who started it in Virginia. Virginia is still perhaps the most
English of the states, certainly more English than New England. And it
was also the most typical and important of the states, almost up to
Lee’s last battle in the Wilderness. But I have only taken the
“Mayflower” as an example of the general truth; and in a way the truth
has its consoling side. Modern men are not allowed to have any history;
but at least nothing can prevent men from having legends.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account