Fancies Versus FadsChesterton, G. K. (Gilbert Keith)
General
Fancies Versus Fads
Chesterton, G. K. (Gilbert Keith)
English essays -- 20th century
A very curious and interesting thing has recently happened in America.
There has suddenly appeared an organized political attack on Darwinian
Evolution, led by an old demagogue appealing entirely to the ideals of
democracy. I mean no discredit to Mr. Bryan in calling him a demagogue;
for I should have been far more heartily on his side in the days when he
was a demagogue than in the days when he was a diplomatist. He was a
much wiser man when he refused to allow the financiers to crucify
humanity on a golden cross, than when he consented to allow the Kaiser
to crucify it on an iron cross. The movement is religious and therefore
popular; but it is Protestant and therefore provincial. Its opponents,
the old guard of materialism, will of course do their best to represent
it as something like the village that voted the earth was flat. But
there is one sharp difference, which is the point of the whole position.
If an ignorant man went about saying that the earth was flat, the
scientific man would promptly and confidently answer, “Oh, nonsense; of
course it’s round.” He might even condescend to give the real reasons,
which I believe are quite different from the current ones. But when the
private citizen rushes wild-eyed down the streets of Heliopolis, Neb.,
calling out “Have you heard the news? Darwin’s wrong!” the scientific
man does not say, “Oh, nonsense, of course he’s right.” He says
tremulously, “Not entirely wrong; surely not entirely wrong”; and we can
draw our conclusions. But I believe myself there is a deeper and more
democratic force behind this reaction; and I think it worthy of further
study.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account