Fancies Versus FadsChesterton, G. K. (Gilbert Keith)
General
Fancies Versus Fads
Chesterton, G. K. (Gilbert Keith)
English essays -- 20th century
Now at the back of all this, of course, the real difference is
religious. I only take this one case of what is called temperance for
the sake of the wider philosophy that underlies it. When my young
American friend talked of the next generation growing up without the
desire for “alcohol,” he had at the back of his mind a certain idea. It
is the idea which I have just seen expressed by another American in a
high-brow article, in the words: “Evolution does not stand still. We are
not finished. The world is not finished.” What it means is that the
nature of man can be modified to suit the convenience of particular men;
and this would certainly be very convenient. If the rich man wants the
miners to live underground, he may really breed for it a new race as
blind as bats and owls. If he finds it cheaper to run the schools and
school inspections on Adamite principles, he can hope to produce
Adamites not merely as a sect but as a species. And the same will be
true of teetotalism or vegetarianism; nature, having evolved man who is
an ale-drinking animal, may now evolve a super-man, or a sub-man, who
shall be a water-drinking animal. Having risen from a monkey who eats
nuts to a man who eats mutton, he may rise yet higher by eating nuts
again.
Thinking people, of course, know that all that is nonsense. They know
there is no such constant flux of adaption. So far from saying that the
evolution of man has not finished, they will point out that (as far as
we know) it has not begun. In all the five thousand years of recorded
history, and in all the prehistoric indications before it, there is not
a shadow or suspicion of movement or change in the human biological
type. Even evolution, let alone natural selection, is only a conjecture
about things unknown, compared with the broad daylight of things known
in all those thousands of years. The only difference is that evolution
seems a probable conjecture, and natural selection is on the face of it
an extravagantly improbable one. All this, which is obvious to thinking
people, has at last become obvious even to the most unthinking; and
_that_ is the meaning of the attack on Darwinism in America and the
battle of Mr. Bryan against the Missing Link. The secret is out. The
obscurantism of the professors is over. Those of us who have humbly
hammered on this point from time to time suddenly find ourselves
hammering on an open door. For these changes almost always come
suddenly; which is alone enough to show that human history at least has
never been merely an evolution. As Darwinism came with a rush, so
Anti-Darwinism has come with a rush; and just as people who accepted
evolution could not be held back from embracing natural selection, so it
is likely enough that many, who now see reason to reject natural
selection, will not be stopped in their course till they have also
rejected evolution. They will merely have a vague but angry conviction
that the professors have been kidding them, as they had before that the
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account