Fancies Versus FadsChesterton, G. K. (Gilbert Keith)
General
Fancies Versus Fads
Chesterton, G. K. (Gilbert Keith)
English essays -- 20th century
they had developed sympathetically some of the Aristotelian æsthetics,
as mediæval philosophers developed sympathetically the Aristotelian
logic and ethics. For a more subtle study of the unities of time and
place, for example, as outlined for the Greek drama, might have led us
towards what is perhaps the last secret of all legend and literature.
It might have suggested why poets, pagan or not, returned perpetually to
the idea of happiness as a place for humanity as a person. It might
suggest why the world is always seeking for absolutes that are not
abstractions; why fairyland was always a land, and even the Superman was
almost a man.
The Boredom of Butterflies
There is one thing which critics perhaps tend to forget when they
complain that Mr. H. G. Wells no longer concerns himself with telling a
story. It is that nobody else could interest and excite us so much
without telling a story. It is possible to read one of his recent novels
almost without knowing the story at all. It is possible to dip into it
as into a book of essays, and pick up opinions here and there. But all
the essays are brilliant essays, and all the opinions are striking
opinions. It does not much matter who holds the opinions; it is possible
that the author does not hold them at all, and pretty certain that he
will not hold them long. But nobody else could make such splendid stuff
out of the very refuse of his rejected opinions. Seen from this side,
even what is called his failure must be recognized as a remarkable
success. The personal story may fade away, but it is something of an
achievement to be still interesting after becoming impersonal; like the
achievement of the Cheshire cat who could grin when he was no longer
there. Moreover, these impersonal and even irresponsible opinions of Mr.
Wells, though never conclusive, are always suggestive; each is a good
starting-point for thought, if only for the thought that refutes it. In
short, the critics of Mr. Wells rather exaggerate the danger of his
story running to speculation, as if it were merely running to seed.
Anyhow, they ought to remember that there are two meanings in running to
seed; and one of them is connected with seed-time.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account