Fancies Versus FadsChesterton, G. K. (Gilbert Keith)
General
Fancies Versus Fads
Chesterton, G. K. (Gilbert Keith)
English essays -- 20th century
I have, however, a particular reason for mentioning the matter here. I
confess there is more than one of Mr. Wells’s recent novels that I have
both read and not read. I am never quite sure that I have read all
Shakespeare or all Boswell’s Johnson; because I have so long had the
habit of opening them anywhere. So I have opened the works of Mr. Wells
anywhere, and had great fun out of the essays that would have seemed
only long parentheses in the story. But, on getting to rather closer
grips with the last of his stories, “The Secret Places of the Heart,” I
think I have caught a glimpse of a difficulty in this sort of narrative
which is something deeper than mere digression. In a story like
“Pickwick” or “Tristram Shandy” digression is never disappointment. But
in this case, differing as I do from the merely hostile critics, I
cannot dispel the atmosphere of disappointment. The story seems
inconclusive in a sense beyond anything merely inconsistent; and I fancy
I can guess why.
A pedantic logician may perhaps imagine that a thing can only be
inconclusive at the conclusion. But I will boldly claim the liberty in
language of saying that this sort of thing is inconclusive from the
start. It begins inconclusive, and in that sense begins dull. The hero
begins by telling the doctor about a mutable flux of flirtation, about
his own experiments as a philanderer, always flitting like a butterfly
from flower to flower. Now, it is highly probable that the diary of a
butterfly would be very dull, even if it were only the diary of a day.
His round need be no more really amusing than a postman’s, since he has
no serious spiritual interest in any of his places of call. Now, by
starting his hero as a philosopher and also philanderer, and taking
seriously his philosophy of philandering, the author as good as tells
us, to start with, that his hero will not have any serious adventures at
all. At the beginning of the story, he practically tells us that there
will be no story. The story of a fickle man is not a story at all;
because there is no strain or resistance in it. Somebody talked about
tales with a twist; and it is certain that all tales are tales with a
tug.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account