Fancies Versus FadsChesterton, G. K. (Gilbert Keith)
General
Fancies Versus Fads
Chesterton, G. K. (Gilbert Keith)
English essays -- 20th century
no sign or gesture from him suggestive of such reflections; and the
working common sense of the thing is that no creatures outside man seem
to have any sense of death at all. Mr. Moore has therefore chosen a
strangely unlucky point upon which to challenge the true egalitarian
doctrine. Almost the most arresting and even startling stamp of the
solidarity and sameness of mankind is precisely this fact, not only of
death, but of the shadow of death. We do know of any man whatever what
we do not know of any other thing whatever, that his death is what we
call a tragedy. From the fact that it is a tragedy flow all the forms
and tests by which we say it is a murder or an execution, a martyrdom or
a suicide. They all depend on an echo or vibration, not only in the soul
of man, but in the souls of all men.
Oddly enough, Mr. Moore has made exactly the same mistake about the
comic as about the tragic. It is true, I think, that almost everything
which has a shape is humorous; but it is not true that everything which
has a shape has a sense of humour. The whale may be laughable, but it is
not the whale who laughs; the image indeed is almost alarming. And the
instant the question is raised, we collide with another colossal fact,
dwarfing all human differentiations; the fact that man is the only
creature who does laugh. In the presence of this prodigious fact, the
fact that men laugh in different degrees, and at different things,
shrivels not merely into insignificance but into invisibility. It is
true that I have often felt the physical universe as something like a
firework display: the most practical of all practical jokes. But if the
cosmos is meant for a joke, men seem to be the only cosmic conspirators
who have been let into the joke. There could be no fraternity like our
freemasonry in that secret pleasure. It is true that there are no limits
to this jesting faculty, that it is not confined to common human jests;
but it is confined to human jesters. Mr. Moore may burst out laughing
when he beholds the morning star, or be thrown into convulsions of
amusement by the effect of moonrise seen through a mist. He may, to
quote his own catalogue, see all the fun of an eagle or an oak tree. We
may come upon him in some quiet dell rolling about in uproarious mirth
at the sight of a violet. But we shall not find the violet in a state of
uproarious mirth at Mr. Moore. He may laugh at the worm; but the worm
will not turn and laugh at him. For that comfort he must come to his
fellow-sinners: I shall always be ready to oblige.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account