Fancies Versus FadsChesterton, G. K. (Gilbert Keith)
General
Fancies Versus Fads
Chesterton, G. K. (Gilbert Keith)
English essays -- 20th century
In the ultimate and universal sense I am astonished at the lack of
astonishment. Starting from scratch, so to speak, we are all in the
position of the first frog, whose pious and compact prayer was: “Lord,
how you made me jump!” Matthew Arnold told us to see life steadily and
see it whole. But the flaw in his whole philosophy is that when we do
see life whole we do not see it steadily, in Arnold’s sense, but as a
staggering prodigy of creation. There is a primeval light in which all
stones are precious stones; a primeval darkness against which all
flowers are as vivid as fireworks. Nevertheless, there is one kind of
surprise that does surprise me, the more, perhaps, because it is not
true surprise but a supercilious fuss. There is a kind of man who not
only claims that his stone is the only pebble on the beach, but declares
it must be the one and only philosopher’s stone, because he is the one
and only philosopher. He does not discover suddenly the sensational fact
that grass is green. He discovers it very slowly, and proves it still
more slowly, bringing us one blade of grass at a time. He is made
haughty instead of humble by hitting on the obvious. The flowers do not
make him open his eyes, but, rather, cover them with spectacles; and
this is even more true of the weeds and thorns. Even his bad news is
banal. A young man told me he had abandoned his Bible religion and
vicarage environment at the withering touch of the one line of
Fitzgerald: “The flower that once has blown, for ever dies.” I vainly
pointed out that the Bible or the English burial service could have told
him that man cometh up as a flower and is cut down. If that were
self-evidently final, there would never have been any Bibles or any
vicarages. I do not see how the flower can be any more dead, when a
mower can cut it down, merely because a botanist can cut it up. It
should further be remembered that the belief in the soul, right or
wrong, arose and flourished among men who knew all there is to know
about cutting down, not unfrequently cutting each other down, with
considerable vivacity. The physical fact of death, in a hundred horrid
shapes, was more naked and less veiled in times of faith or superstition
than in times of science or scepticism. Often it was not merely those
who had seen a man die, but those who had seen him rot, who were most
certain that he was everlastingly alive.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account