Farm drainage: The Principles, Processes, and Effects of Draining Land with Stones, Wood, Plows, and Open Ditches, and Especially with TilesFrench, Henry F. (Henry Flagg)
Science
Farm drainage: The Principles, Processes, and Effects of Draining Land with Stones, Wood, Plows, and Open Ditches, and Especially with Tiles
French, Henry F. (Henry Flagg)
Drainage
"Along the top of the table is placed the mean widths in inches,
and on the left-hand side the depths of the drains, extending from
30 inches to 5 feet. The numbers in the body of the table express
cubic yards, and decimals of a yard. In making use of the table, it
is necessary first to find the mean width of the drain, from the
widths at the top and bottom. Thus, if a drain 3 feet deep were 16
inches wide at the top, and 4 inches at the bottom, the mean width
would be half of 16 added to 4, or 10; then, by looking in the
table for the column under 10 (width), and opposite 36 (inches of
depth), we find the number of cubic yards in each rod of such a
drain to be 1.53, or somewhat more than one and a half. If we
compare this with another drain 20 inches wide at the top, 4 inches
at the bottom, and 4-1/2 feet deep, we have the mean width 12, and
looking at the table under 12 and opposite 54, we find 2.75 cubic
yards, or two and three-quarters to the rod. In this case, the
quantity of earth to be removed is nearly twice as much as in the
other, and hence, as far as regards the digging, the cost of the
labor will be nearly double. But in the case of deep drains, the
cost increases slightly for another reason, namely, the increased
labor of lifting the earth to the surface from a greater depth."
Under the title of the "Depth of Drains," other reasons are suggested
why shallow drains are more easily wrought than deeper drains. The
widths given in English treatises, and found perfectly practicable
there, with proper drainage-tools, will seem to us exceedingly narrow.
Mr. Parkes gives the width of the top of a four-foot drain 18 inches,
of a three-and-a-half foot drain 16 inches, and of a three-foot drain 12
inches. He gives the width of drains for tiles, three inches at bottom,
and those for stones, eight inches. Of the cost of excavating a given
number of cubic yards of earth from drains, it is difficult to give
reliable estimates. In the writer's own field, where a pick was used to
loosen the lower two feet of earth, the labor of opening and filling
drains 4 feet deep, and of the mean width of 14 inches, all by hand
labor, has been, in a mile of drains, being our first experiments, about
one day's labor to three rods in length. The excavated earth of such a
drain, measures not quite three cubic yards. (Exactly, 2.85.)
In work subsequently executed, we have opened our drains of 4 foot
depth, but 20 inches at top, and 4 inches at bottom, giving a mean width
of 12 inches. In one instance, in the Summer of 1858, two men opened 14
rods of such drain in one day. In six days, the same two men opened,
laid, and filled 947 feet, or about 57-1/2 rods of such drain. Their
labor was worth $12.00, or 21 cents per rod. The actual cost of this job
was as follows:
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account