She slipped off her apron and emptied the contents of the basket in the
folds. She was just gathering the bundle up when a stray word caught
her eye. She glanced back at it, puzzled, suddenly suspicious.
"Concession?"—that was not a term of which one made general use. She
took up the torn slip of paper—"... _garding the terms of the
concession._"
The first word was broken, but it was obvious enough: "Regarding the
terms of the concession." What did that mean? The note was in Brand’s
handwriting; to what concession did he refer? Forgotten words and acts
returned to her; the terrible suspicion raised by Lady Wereminster’s
innocent words—the scene in the hall, now some time back.
She stood for a moment looking down, bewildered; then bolted the door
and prepared slowly to sift, one by one, the contents of the basket.
Brand was a careful man. He had disposed of the torn-up pieces of his
notes of the Treaty which he had stolen from Farquharson in various
channels. Some had been thrown from the window; others scattered in the
wind on his way to the Strand; there were but a few pieces of the
original paper upon which he had scrawled his first rough translation of
the cypher in the waste-paper basket, which Evelyn’s careless
maid-servant had left there for more than a week, because it was not
noticeably full.
She had set out upon the table certain familiar words and phrases in an
unfamiliar shape. As yet she did not take in their full force. Yet
they rang, with curious insistence, at the door of her heart; she was
sure that in some way they affected the welfare both of herself and him
she loved. Fate—rather, God—had decreed that she should find them and
act upon her knowledge.
She looked at them again, amazed and stupefied. They had been written in
a hurry, and blotted, seemingly, upon soiled blotting-paper; the words,
even the separate words, were blurred and almost unintelligible. Yet
some stood out, clear and distinct: "Treaty—concession—negotiations,"
the very name of the Power involved. And all these she recalled; she
had read them on the morning after the great scene in the House; they
were the terms of the Treaty which Farquharson was supposed to have sold
to the Power that coveted England’s supremacy.
Why should Brand have copied them when he could have cut out the more
concise account that was printed in the daily papers? ... And this work
showed signs of obliteration and change, as though translated by an
unaccustomed hand; there were many erasures and corrections. In one
case, for instance, there was the revision of a complete sentence which
had obviously been misunderstood at first by a reader unversed in the
code.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account