Fetichism in West Africa : $b forty years' observation of native customs and superstitionsNassau, Robert Hamill
Philosophy
Fetichism in West Africa : $b forty years' observation of native customs and superstitions
Nassau, Robert Hamill
Ethnology -- Africa, West; Fetishism -- Africa, West
The next step in the process is the selection of the substances which are
to be packed into the hollow of the horn. These are of both animal and
vegetable origin, but mostly vegetable. They may be very absurd to our
civilized view, they may be disgusting and even filthy; but they are all
ranked as "medicine," have actually some fitness to the end in view, as
described in the previous chapter, and are to be as carefully regarded as
are the ingredients of a physician's prescription by a druggist. Their
absurdity must not militate against the view of them as "medicine," even
to a civilized mind. We are not to forget that, all superstitious and
fetich ideas aside, our own pharmacopœia one hundred years ago
contained animal products of supposed therapeutic value that were clumsy,
annoying, and even disgusting. Indeed, it is only in very modern medicine
that the profession have thought it worth while to regard the matter of
agreeable look and pleasant taste. Homœopathy, even if we do not all
believe in it, must be given credit for at least eliminating nauseous
taste from the attributes of a good medicine, even of an emetic.
From the wide range of substances, mineral, animal, and vegetable, the
magic doctor takes generally some plant. Indeed, so associated is the
doctor's thought of a tree and some spirit belonging to it, that an
educated and very intelligent native chief at Gabun who still clings to
many heathen practices, of whom recently I asked an explanation of fetich
from the native point of view, said sententiously, "A principle of fetich
comes from trees." This carried to me very little meaning. I asked him to
explain at length. He did so. He said that in the long ago, while still
his ancestors knew of God and had not entirely forgotten to give him some
kind of worship, their medicine men were botanists, and, like Solomon,
"spake of trees." The herbs and barks they used were employed solely for
their own intrinsically curative qualities. But as people became more
degraded and "like people, like priest," the medicine men added a ritual
of song, dances, incantations, and auguries by which to dignify their
profession with mystery. As they grew in power, they added claims of
spiritual influence, by which to impress their patients with fear and to
exact obedience even from kings, until finally the idea of a spirit as the
efficient agent in the cure was substituted for that of the drug itself,
and fetich belief dominated all.
The reason for the choice of one tree rather than another in a given case
of sickness is almost impossible to find out. Perhaps there is a vague
tradition of the fact that it was used long ago by those who first
happened to discover that it had real medicinal quality, and the present
generation continues to use it, though having forgotten what that quality
was, or even that it had any intrinsic quality of its own, their etiology
of disease assigning as the cause of all sickness the antagonistic
presence of an evil spirit.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account