Fetichism in West Africa : $b forty years' observation of native customs and superstitionsNassau, Robert Hamill
Philosophy
Fetichism in West Africa : $b forty years' observation of native customs and superstitions
Nassau, Robert Hamill
Ethnology -- Africa, West; Fetishism -- Africa, West
"The tribes we have passed through seem to have one common religion, if it
can be called by that name. They say there is one great spirit, who rules
over all the other spirits; but they worship and sacrifice to the spirits
of ancestors, so far as I can learn, and have a mass of fetich medicines
and enchantments. The hunter takes one kind of charm with him; the
warrior another. For divining they have a basket filled with bones, teeth,
finger-nails, claws, seeds, stones, and such articles, which are rattled
by the diviner till the spirit comes and speaks to him by the movement of
these things. When the spirit is reluctant to be brought up, a solemn
dirge is chanted by the people. All is attention while the diviner utters
a string of short sentences in different tones, which are repeated after
him by the audience."[46]
CHAPTER IX
THE FETICH--WITCHCRAFT--A BLACK ART--DEMONOLOGY
The distinction sought to be made by the half-civilized Negro between a
white art and a black art, as a justification of his practice of fetich
enchantments, lies in the object to be obtained by their use. He vainly
tries to find a parallel to them in Christian use of fire-arms,--proper
for defence, improper for unprovoked assault. The black art he admits is
wrong, its object being to kill or injure some one else; the white he
thinks allowable, because with it he acts simply on the defensive. He
wishes to ward off a possible blow of an unseen foe aimed at himself. He
professes his intention not to strike or take otherwise active measures to
injure any known person. After every allowance made, the distinction
between the arts as moral and immoral is not a clear one. They differ only
in their degree of immorality. The means both use are immoral, not
justified by the possible goodness of the desired end, and not sanctified
by the intention of the user. Both use fetiches. Fetich, if it has power
at all, is not of God; if it is powerless, it is folly. Thus, in every and
any case, it dishonors God.
But whatever doubt there might have been as to the allowability of white
art practice, there is no doubt as to the immorality of black art. It
always contemplates a possible taking of life.
The term "witchcraft," which attaches itself to all fetichism, localizes
itself in the black art practice, which is thus pre-eminently known as
"witchcraft." Its practitioners are all "wizards" or "witches." The user
of the white is not so designated. He or she does not deny the use; it is
open and without any sense of criminality in the eyes of the community,
however much he or she may endeavor to suppress the fact from the
knowledge of church officers. But a practitioner of the black art denies
it and carries on his practice secretly.
The above distinction is observed by travellers in other parts of Africa,
as will be seen by the following quotations, which give also an
interesting exposition of the ceremonies and practices of the black art in
different regions:
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account