? Hugh de Scalers 15[88] ? Stephen de Scalers 15 Gilbert de Pinkeni 15 Geoffrey Ridel 15 Robert Foliot 15 Robert de Choques 15 Robert de Caux 15 William Paynell 15 (?) Richard de Reimes 10 Roger de Buron 10 Richard fitz William 10 William fitz Alan 10 Richard de Cormeilles 10 Roger de Kentswell 10 William Trussebut 10 Nigel de Lovetot 10 Manasser Arsic 10 Richard de Montacute 10 Wandrille de Courcelles 10 Walter de Bolebec (Bucks) 10 Robert de Hastings 10 Lambert de Scotenni 10 Drogo de Montacute 10 (?)[89] William de Reimes 10 (?)[90] William de Helion 10 (?)[91] Graeland de Thani of Essex owed seven and a half knights (the half of fifteen), and Roger de Berkeley probably the same. Those who owed a _servitium_ of five knights were Robert fitz Harding, Baldwin Buelot, Simon de Cancy, Nigel de Lovetot (of the honour of Tickhill), Amfry de Cancy, Hugh de Dover (of the honour of Brunne),[92] Walter de Bolebec (Northumberland), Robert de Brus, Roger Bertram, and probably Stephen de Bulmer,[93] and Herbert 'de Castello'. The cases in which the _servitium_ can be shown not to have been a multiple of five are comparatively few. That of Simon de Beauchamp of Bedford was 54, of William Fossard 33-1/2, of Humphrey de Bohun 30-1/2, of William Malet 20-1/6, of Robert de Beauchamp (of Somerset) 17, of William fitz John (of Harptree) 13-3/4, of William Blund 12, of Hugh Wac 10-1/8, of William de Ros, William fitz John (of Weston) and William de Beauchamp (of Worcestershire) 7, of John de Bidun and Jocelin de Lovaine 5-1/2.[94] But these, it will be seen, are quite insufficient to overthrow the accumulated array of evidence on the other side, and some of them are, doubtless, capable of explanation. The Bohun fief, for instance, in 1162 paid on exactly 30 fees.