This was the last levy raised previous to the making of the returns (_cartae_) in 1166. These returns were followed in 1168 by the first levy on the new assessment. I have already dealt with the changes which this new assessment involved, but I would here again insist upon the fact that the church and the lay fiefs were not dealt with alike, the latter being assessed wholly _de novo_, while the former retained their old assessments, while accounting separately, and under protest, for the fees in excess of their _servitium debitum_. So far as the lay fiefs were concerned, their _servitia_, congenital with Norman rule, were now swept away. Here, from the single county of Northumberland, are three cases in point: 1162 1168 De scutagio Walteri de Bolebec. Walterus de Bolebec redd. comp. In thesauro v. marcae.[172] de iiii. marcis et dim. de eodem auxilio. Idem debet xlviii. s. et v. d. pro tribus Militibus et ii^{abus.} terciis partibus Mil. de Novo feffamento. De scutagio Stephani de Bulemer. Stephanus de Bulemer redd. In thesauro v. marcae. comp. de iiii. marcis de eodem auxilio. Idem debet xxiii. s. et iiii. d. de i. milite et dim. et quarta parte Mil. de Novo feffamento. De scutagio Radulfi de Wircestria. Radulfus de Wigornio redd. comp. In thesauro i. marca.[173] de i. marca de eodem auxilio pro i. milite. Idem debet xiii. s. de dim. Mil. et de i. tercia et de i. septima parte Mil. de Novo feffamento. The change thus made by the restless king was permanent in its effect, and thenceforth the only assessment recognized was that based upon the fees, which, by 1166, had been created de veteri and de novo.[174]