Pinchbeck 12 Spalding 12 Weston 6 Moulton 6 Whaplode and Holbeach 18 Fleet 6 Gedney 8} 12 Lutton 4} Sutton 9-3/4} 12 Tydd 2-1/4} ---- 84 The Lindsey Survey would describe such a Wapentake as containing 'Seven Hundreds'. Crossing the border from Lincolnshire into Rutland (_i.e._ the Rutland of Domesday), we find the same system at work that meets us in the Lindsey Survey. We read: In Alfnodestou Wapent' sunt ii. Hundrez. In unoquoque [sunt] xii. carucatæ ad geldum.... In Martinesleie Wap' est i. hundret, in quo xii. carucatæ ad geldum.--_D.B._, i. 293_b._ On analysing the contents of these Wapentakes, we find this statement fully borne out, the former containing twenty-four, and the latter twelve, 'carucatæ terræ'. These are carefully contrasted throughout with the 'terra carucæ' or areal measure.[146] In Yorkshire, Notts and Derby, we have less direct evidence. Sawley, in Derbyshire, has indeed been alleged to be entered in Domesday as a Hundred of twelve carucates, but Domesday does not justify this assertion being made.[147] I would rather trust to the notable formula, which, as I explained at the outset, is common to these counties for proof that they also were arranged in 'Hundreds' of twelve carucates. The prevalence, however, of assessment by sixes, threes, and twelves, meets us on every side, as does, in hidated districts, the assessments by fives and tens. At the outset, for instance, of the survey of Yorkshire we have the district 'gelding' with the city assessed at eighty-four (12×7) carucates (which would be described in Lincolnshire as seven 'Hundreds'). We have two lists of the details, which are given here.[148] _Car. terræ_ _Car. terræ_ Archbishop 6 Archbishop 6 Osboldeuuic 6 Osboldeuuic 6 Stocthun 6 Stochetun 6 Sa'bura 3 Sa'bure 3 Heuuarde 6 Heuuorde 6 Ditto 3 Fuleford 10 Fuleforde 10 Round the City 3 Round the City 3 Cliftune 18 Cliftune 18 Roudclif 3 Roudeclif 3 Ouertun 5 Ouertune 5 Sceltun 9 Scheltune 9 Mortun 3 Mortune 3 Wichistun 1 Wichintun 3 ---- ---- '84' '84'