Burton 12 Grenzmore (4+2) 6 Arpen (4+8) 12 Chillon (30+11+7) 48 Roreston (9+3) 12 Logetorp (1-1/2+5-1/2) 7 } Thirnon 7 } Ascheltorp (4+2) 6 } 36 Torp 3 } Cherendebi 13 } Caretorp (5+4+3) 12 Rodestain (8+8+8) 24 Twenc 17-1/4 Suauetorp 9 Fornetorp (4+14) 18 Butruid 12 Langetou (9+6) 15 } Buitorp 5 } Bruneton 3 } 42 Galmeton 8 } Binneton 6 } Widlaueston 5 The evidence of this last Hundred is so overwhelming that it cannot be gainsaid.[169] I claim, therefore, that my theory holds good even in Canon Taylor's stronghold, but I do so without venturing to dispute the accuracy of his own. How far they can be reconciled I leave to others to decide. There are certain difficulties, however, which his brilliant suggestion must raise. It is the essence of his theory that in a two-field Manor the ploughland of 160 acres (half fallow) was assessed at _one_ 'carucata terræ', while in the three-field Manor the ploughland of 180 acres (a third fallow) was assessed at _two_. This would be an obvious and gross injustice. Again, remembering that, according to the Canon, the proportion of 'carucatæ' to ploughlands should be either 2 to 1 or 1 to 1, what are we to make of such figures as these, taken at a venture from a page of the Leicestershire Survey (232_a_, 1): _Carucatæ_ _Ploughlands_ _Carucata_ _Ploughlands_ 1 2 12 8 1 1/2 11-1/8 7 2 1 9 4 5-5/8 4 7 6 2 1 6 5 2-5/8 4 2 4 1 1 10 7 6 4 9 6 8-7/8 6 5/8 1/2 1/2 1/2 6 4 (thrice) 28 22 4-7/8 3