Field, Forest and Farm: Things interesting to young nature-lovers, including some matters of moment to gardeners and fruit-growersFabre, Jean-Henri
History
Field, Forest and Farm: Things interesting to young nature-lovers, including some matters of moment to gardeners and fruit-growers
Fabre, Jean-Henri
Agriculture; Natural history
“There is, however, one way to obtain an uninterrupted succession of
crops from the same land unless the soil is very poor. All plants
derive their nourishment from the soil and the atmosphere; but some
take more from the atmosphere, others from the soil. The plants that
get their sustenance chiefly from the air are those that have luxuriant
foliage. The potato is one of these. You know that it is through their
leaves that plants obtain the carbonic acid gas diffused in the air.
The greater the spread of foliage, the more abundant will this
absorption be. The plants that depend almost wholly on the soil are
those with only a few small, slender leaves, thus taking but little
carbonic acid gas from the air. Such is wheat.
“Moreover, from the potato plant we take only the tubers, which form
but a small part of the whole, and we turn under the stalks and leaves,
which are thereupon converted into humus. Thus the potato has the
property of enriching the soil at the expense of the atmosphere, and it
gives back more than it takes. It is, then, one of the enriching rather
than impoverishing plants in respect to its action on the soil.
Cereals, on the contrary, are utilized by the harvester both as to seed
and haulm, nothing but the meager roots being left in the ground; and
as, on account of their very scanty foliage, cereals derive almost
their entire sustenance from the soil, they take from it much more than
they give back to it. They accordingly belong to the class of plants
that impoverish rather than enrich the soil in which they grow.
“It is impossible, thus, except by a ruinous expenditure of fertilizer,
to raise a crop of grain every year on the same land. But if we should
let potatoes succeed wheat, and wheat succeed potatoes, what would be
the result? The latter crop, deriving a large part of its nourishment
from the air, would flourish in soil comparatively exhausted by wheat;
and on having its leaves and stalks turned under it would give back to
the soil a part of its former fertility. Wheat could then be
successfully raised again on the same land.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account