It must also be noted that the Swiss census includes under the name
of _Heimarbeit_ (domestic trades) only those “dependencies of the
industrial employers” which do not represent separate factories
placed under the employer’s management; so that those workshops
and small factories, the produce of which is sold directly to the
consumers, as also the small factories directly managed by small
employers, are not included in this category. If all that be taken
into consideration, we must agree with the conclusion that the
“domestic trades have in Switzerland a much greater extension than
in any other country of Europe” (save Russia), which we find in
an elaborate recent work, published in connection with the 1910
exhibition of Swiss domestic industries, and edited by Herr Jac.
Lorenz (_Die wirtschaftlichen und sozialen Verhältnisse in der
Schweizerischen Heimarbeit_, Zurich, 1910-1911, p. 27).
A feature of importance which appears from this last work is, that
more than one-half of the workers engaged in domestic trades have
some other source of income besides these trades. Very many of them
carry on agriculture, so that it has been said that in Switzerland
“the domestic trades’ question is as much _a peasant question_ as a
labour question.”
It would be impossible to sum up in this place the interesting data
contained in the first four fascicles published by Herr Lorenz, which
deal with the cotton, the silk, and the linen domestic industries,
their struggles against the machine, their defeats in some branches
and their holding the ground in other branches, and so on. I must
therefore refer the reader to this very instructive publication.
THE END.
FOOTNOTES:
[199] “Great Britain’s Capital Investments in Other Lands” (_Journal
of the Statistical Society_, September 1909, vol. lxxii., pp.
475-495), followed by a most interesting discussion; and “Great
Britain’s Capital Investments in India, Colonial and Foreign
Countries,” same journal, January 1911, vol. lxxiv., pp. 167-200.
[200] T. M. Young, _The American Cotton Industry_. Introduction
by Elijah Helm, secretary to the Manchester Chamber of Commerce,
London 1902; and T. W. Uttley, _Cotton Spinning and Manufacturing
in the United States: A report ... of a tour of the American cotton
manufacturing centres made in 1903 and 1904_. Publications of
Manchester University, Economic Series, No. II., Manchester, 1905.
[201] _Ten Years of Sunshine in the British Isles_, 1881-1890.
[202] Dr. M. Fesca, _Beiträge zur Kenntniss der Japanesischen
Landwirthschaft_, Part ii., p. 33 (Berlin, 1893). The economy in
seeds is also considerable. While in Italy 250 kilogrammes to the
hectare are sown, and 160 kilogrammes in South Carolina, the Japanese
use only sixty kilogrammes for the same area. (Semler, _Tropische
Agrikultur_, Bd. iii., pp. 20-28.)
[203] Eugène Simon, _La cité chinoise_ (translated into English);
Toubeau, _La répartition métrique des impôts_, 2 vols., Paris
(Guillaumin), 1880.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account