Fifth Report of the Vestry of the Parish of Chelsea in the County of Middlesex, Appointed Under the Metropolis Local Management Act, 1855: 1860-1Lahee, Charles
History
Fifth Report of the Vestry of the Parish of Chelsea in the County of Middlesex, Appointed Under the Metropolis Local Management Act, 1855: 1860-1
Lahee, Charles
Chelsea (London, England) -- History -- 19th century; Chelsea (London, England) -- Politics and government
CLAUSE 93, enacting that a Vestry or District Board may require payment
of costs or expenses from an owner or occupier, and the occupier paying
to deduct from rent. _Remark referred to_:—‘We do not think the clause
goes far enough. The Vestry to be properly protected against their
enormous outlay, should have a statutable charge upon the premises for
moneys expended by them recovered by judgment. We see no reason why the
Vestry should not have a power of sale something similar to that given to
the Commissioners of Police under the 74th section of the Metropolitan
Buildings Act, 18 & 19 Vic., cap. 122; unless this is effectually done,
the annual loss to every parish which carries out the intentions of the
Metropolis Local Management Act, must be considerable; the Act will
become a dead letter, or Vestries must be protected from loss.’
_Resolved_,—That the attention of the Solicitors be directed to the
discrepancy between the marginal note to Clause 52, and the body of the
clause.
_Resolved_,—That the Solicitors do endeavour to obtain the following
alterations:—Clause 90 in the Bill above referred to, line 29, omit the
words, ‘which may be unfit for the keeping of swine, or where the
breeding, feeding, or keeping swine may create a nuisance or be injurious
to health,’ in order to insert the words, ‘within forty yards of any
street.’
Line 31, insert after the word ‘place’ the words, ‘or in any locality,
premises, or place in such manner as to be a nuisance to other persons
residing near thereto.’
_Resolved_,—That the Solicitors and the Vestry Clerk be instructed to
arrange with Mr. Tite as to the best mode of obtaining the above
alterations in the Bill now before Parliament.
* * * * *
_The Vestry Clerk to W. Tite_, _Esq._, _M.P._
April 25th, 1861.
METROPOLIS LOCAL MANAGEMENT ACT AMENDMENT BILL.
Sir,
I am directed to send you copy of a Petition of this Vestry to the House
of Commons respecting your Bills (Nos. 1 & 2) for Amending the Metropolis
Local Management Act, which Lord Enfield has been requested to present.
I am also to send you the four new clauses and amendments which are
referred to in the prayer of the Petition, and to request that you will
obtain the introduction of them into the Bill No. 1.
I have the honor to be, Sir,
Your obedient Servant,
CHAS. LAHEE,
Vestry Clerk.
W. Tite, Esq., M.P., &c., &c.,
42, Lowndes Square.
* * * * *
_To the Honourable the Commons of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and
Ireland in Parliament assembled_.
The Petition of the Vestry of the Parish of St. Luke, Chelsea, in the
County of Middlesex,
SHEWETH,
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account