Business; Capitalists and financiers -- United States; Speculation; Wall Street (New York, N.Y.)
My only apology for inserting the above address and resolutions is, that
I believe they constitute a valuable epitome of a very important
chapter, yet to be more fully written, of the political history of the
United States.
A greater criterion of the success of the meeting, however, was the
editorial opinion of the _Evening Post_ next day, which had been for a
long time previously very bitter in its attacks upon General Grant. It
said:
“The meeting held last evening at the Cooper Institute was, we
believe, without precedent in our political history. It was
expressly called as a gathering of that branch of the Republican
party which desires the nomination and re-election of President
Grant. Yet, when it came together, the officers and speakers
assumed that it was a mass meeting of the Republicans of New
York. This is to say, according to the organizers and promoters
of this gathering, the one test of Republicanism now is the
political support of one man’s aspirations, and that before any
nomination has been made by that party. This is a singular
position to receive the approval, at least, by their
acquiescence, of such men as some scores of those whose names
are prominent in the report of the meeting, and who, as we know,
would prefer some other candidate than General Grant, if they
could hope to control the Philadelphia nomination.
“The power of this meeting was wholly in its organization. The
list of officers chosen by it is, on the whole, the best, most
reputable, and most influential commanded by any partisan
meeting within our recollection. There are a few names on it
which disgrace their fellows; there are many which carry no
weight, but an unusually large proportion of the very long list
are eminent and representative names in this city. The audience
assembled was in many respects in keeping with the officers. It
consisted mainly of reputable, thoughtful voters.”
The good work was continued until November with the result that is now
historical.
The New York _Sun_ said: “We believe that Henry Clews did more, in a
pecuniary way, to promote the success of Grant, than any Republican
millionaire of the Union League Club.”
Another mass meeting was held late in the fall. Referring to it, and
other events of that period, the President’s Secretary writes a few days
prior to the election as follows:
WASHINGTON, D. C., Nov. 2, 1872.
MY DEAR CLEWS:
We are all greatly obliged for the documents and information
which you have sent us during the campaign. The President says
the list of vice-presidents of the last Cooper Institute meeting
is the most remarkable list of prominent names he has ever seen
upon one paper. It will of itself do great good.
Our news is charming from all quarters, and all our hopes will,
without doubt, be fully realized on Tuesday next.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account