Final Report of the Louisiana Purchase Exposition CommissionLouisiana Purchase Exposition Commission
History
Final Report of the Louisiana Purchase Exposition Commission
Louisiana Purchase Exposition Commission
Louisiana Purchase Exposition (1904 : Saint Louis, Mo.)
On May 24, 1904, the Commission adopted the following resolution:
_Resolved_, That Mr. Thurston, as a member of the judiciary
committee present, call upon Judge Ferris, general counsel for
the Exposition Company, and indicate to him the condition of
correspondence with reference to free admissions to the fair
grounds, and to suggest to him that in the absence of any
disposition on the part of the Exposition Company to take notice
of the protests of the Commission, he has been authorized to
prepare the case for submission to the Attorney-General of the
United States, with request that action be taken in the courts
to prevent further violation of the law and rules as agreed upon
by the joint action of the company and the Commission.
On the same day Mr. Thurston, in a conference with Judge Ferris, general
counsel of the Exposition Company, brought the said action of the
Commission to his attention and insisted that the Exposition Company
should at once take immediate steps to put an end to the excessive and
improper issuance of free passes. Mr. Thurston was assured by Judge
Ferris that he would immediately consult with the exposition officials
and endeavor to secure such action on their part as would meet the views
and wishes of the Commission.
As there was no apparent cessation in the distribution of passes, the
president of the Commission, on May 31, addressed the following
communication to the president of the Exposition Company:
MAY 31, 1904.
SIR: Under date of May 26 Secretary Stevens transmitted to the
National Commission what he denominated "The rules and
regulations governing and restricting the issuance and use of
passes," as adopted by the company and now in operation. This
communication, with the rules referred to attached, was
obviously intended as an answer to the communication of the
Commission to the company on that subject under dates of May 10
and May 19.
I am directed by the Commission to call your attention to the
following sentence contained in my letter of 19th, above
referred to, to wit:
"Persons not entitled to admission to the grounds under article
5 of the rules and regulations can only be legally and properly
admitted by the Exposition Company with the approval of the
National Commission."
With that proposition the answer of the executive committee of
your company takes issue by submitting what you evidently deemed
a sufficient answer through rules and regulations adopted by the
company and now in operation, without the approval of the
Commission.
The Commission understands that the following issues arise from
this letter and the correspondence to which it refers, to wit:
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account