"The interests of landholders are partially safeguarded by the Act
that requires all documents effecting the transfer of immovable
property to be registered, but it could be explained, though not in
the short space of this letter, how the provisions of the Act can be,
and frequently are, fulfilled in the absence of the principal person,
the executor.
"Enough has been said to show that if some simple but efficient means
could be contrived to identify the person who has executed a bond,
cases of fraud such as these would practically disappear from the
judicial registers. Were the legislature to amend the Registration Act
and require that the original document as well as the copy in the
Registration Book should bear the imprint of one or more fingers of
the parties to the deed, I have little hesitation in saying that not
only would fraud be detected, but that in a short time the facility of
that detection would act as a deterrent for the future. [This was
precisely the experience of Sir W. Herschel.--F.G.] In the majority of
cases, the mere question would be, Is the man A the same person as B,
or is he not? and of that question the finger marks would give
unerring proof. For example, to take the simplest case, A is sued for
possession of some land, the title of which he is stated to have
parted with to another for a consideration. The document and the
Registration Book both bear the imprint of the index finger of the
right hand of A. A repudiates, and a comparison shows that whereas
the finger pattern of A is a whorl, the imprint on the document is a
loop; consequently A did not execute it.
"In the identification of Government pensioners the finger print
method would be very valuable. At one period, I had the payment of
many hundreds of military pensioners. Personation was most difficult
to detect in persons coming from a distance, who had no local
acquaintances, and more especially where the claimants were women. The
marks of identification noted in the pension roll were usually
variations of:--"Hair black--Eyes brown--Complexion wheat
colour--Marks of tattooing on fore-arm"--terms which are equally
appropriate to a large number of the pensioners. The description was
supplemented in some instances, where the pensioner had some
distinguishing mark or scar, but such cases are considerably rarer
than might be supposed, and in women the marks are not infrequently in
such a position as to practically preclude comparison. Here also the
imprint of one or more finger prints on the pension certificate, would
be sufficient to settle any doubt as to identity.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account