The proportions of a typical loop on the thumb are easily ascertained if
we may assume that the most frequent values of its variable elements,
taken separately, are the same as those that enter into the most frequent
combination of the elements taken collectively. This would necessarily be
true if the variability of each element separately, and that of the sum of
them in combination, were all strictly normal, but as they are only
quasi-normal, the assumption must be tested. I have done so by making the
comparisons (_A_) and (_B_) shown in Table XXXIV., which come out
correctly to within the first decimal place.
TABLE XXXIV.
+------------------------------------------------------+
| |Right | Left |
| |Thumb.|Thumb.|
|----------------------------------------|------|------|
|(_a_) Median of all the values of KL | 12.5 | 10.1 |
|(_b_) Median of all the values of NB | 10.1 | 8.9 |
| |------|------|
|(_A_) Value of _a/b_ | 1.24| 1.11|
|(_A_) Median of all the fractions KL/NB| 1.15| 1.10|
|========================================|======|======|
|(_c_) Median of all the values of AN | 4.6 | 4.6 |
|(_d_) Median of all the values of AH | 4.4 | 3.3 |
| |------|------|
|(_B_) Value of _c/d_ | 1.05| 1.40|
|(_B_) Median of all the fractions AN/AH| 1.08| 1.36|
+------------------------------------------------------+
It has been shown that the patterns are hereditary, and we have seen that
they are uncorrelated with race or temperament or any other noticeable
peculiarity, inasmuch as groups of very different classes are alike in
their finger marks. They cannot exercise the slightest influence on
marriage selection, the very existence both of the ridges and of the
patterns having been almost overlooked; they are too small to attract
attention, or to be thought worthy of notice. We therefore possess a
perfect instance of promiscuity in marriage, or, as it is now called,
panmixia, in respect to these patterns. We might consequently have
expected them to be hybridised. But that is not the case; they _refuse to
blend_. Their classes are as clearly separated as those of any of the
genera of plants and animals. They keep pure and distinct, as if they had
severally descended from a thorough-bred ancestry, each in respect to its
own peculiar character.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account