First harvests : $b An episode in the life of Mrs. Levison Gower : A satire without a moralStimson, Frederic Jesup
General
First harvests : $b An episode in the life of Mrs. Levison Gower : A satire without a moral
Stimson, Frederic Jesup
American fiction -- 19th century
“I tell you,” said he, “we must change it all. A man is only worth
what he makes. They tell us society would be a chaos without private
property; I tell them it is private property that makes a chaos of
society. They talk about the law! the law! I tell them the world would
be better without law. It is a bogey, invented to scare off us ignorant
fellows from the plunder the rich have appropriated, just such a bogey
as religion was, only religion has been exploded. It is the law’s turn
to go next. All property is robbery; and it is only because land-owners
are the worst thieves of all, that we feel differently about other
things. The earth belongs to the human race; and no man can rightly own
its surface, whether he got his title from a feudal baron or a Spanish
general, any more than he can own the air of heaven. But property in
other things is just as bad; and Jay Gould is a worse man than the Duke
of Westminster, though he has ten million acres and Gould only a few
hundred. How much of his wealth represents the honest labor of himself
or his forefathers?”
There was a murmur of applause at this. There were some half dozen men
in the room, all sober and apparently intelligent, and all natural-born
Americans.
“But somebody must own things,” one of them remarked. “Somebody must
own the mills, and the railroads, and the machinery. Why up to our
works we’ve got a single engine that cost nigh unto eighty thousand
dollars.”
“We can all own them,” Starbuck went on earnestly, “just as we all made
them. Who do you suppose made that eighty-thousand dollar machine--the
banks with their money and so-called capital, or the men as put it
together? A man is worth just what he makes, I tell you. Can Jay Gould
make an engine? But because we’ve all got to have a little land, and
a little plant and money, are those as have got it to take away from
us ninety-nine per cent. of all we make? Yes--if we’re fools enough
to stand it. A man can have what he can keep and use, what he can eat
and what he can wear. If he chooses to store up his day’s labor, to
set aside the bread and meat he earns, he can do so, and keep it till
it spoils. But this dog-in-the-manger business ain’t to be carried no
further; and if a feller squats down on land, and don’t use it, an’
another feller without no land comes along and wants it, that first
feller has got to get up and git--that’s all. A man’s a man for what he
is, for what he can do--not for what he owns.”
“But who’s going to support the Government?”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account