First Love: A Novel. Vol. 3 of 3Loudon, Mrs. (Margracia)
General
First Love: A Novel. Vol. 3 of 3
Loudon, Mrs. (Margracia)
Fiction
“Oh no, there was no room for misunderstanding; he was explicit enough,
I assure you! Why, he was little short of angry, (as if it was my fault,
that Lady Susan chose to prefer the Marquis of H.), that hope had been
all, he said, that, in his eyes, gave value to existence; and he would,
therefore, leave England for ever!” The firmness our heroine had been
affecting, here gave way, and her voice faltered. Frances embraced her.
“Oh, and he talked all sorts of ridiculous nonsense,” continued
Julia, as she vainly endeavoured to check her tears, “about dying an
honourable death, and said, that my congratulating him, on his late
good fortune, was a mockery. I used, I am sure, to pity him, if he only
looked melancholy for a moment; but really, this caricature, of sorrow,
one cannot sympathise with!” Julia seems to forget a grand distinction:
when she used to feel such indulgent pity for the melancholy look, she
believed that love, for herself, was its source; it was quite another
thing now; she could see the folly of being in despair about any body
else.
“And what a time,” said Frances, “to behave ungratefully! It is certainly
very unlike Edmund. Indeed Julia, I think you must have mistaken him,
some way.” Julia shook her head. “We used, you know, to imagine,”
continued Frances, “that it would be such a time of rejoicing, whenever
Edmund was discovered to be some great person, (as Mr. Jackson always
said would be the case;) and now, the time is come; and we only seem
to have lost our own Edmund. How could I have been so mistaken! I was
absolutely certain that he was breaking his heart about his love for you:
yet, if he was, this would not be the time to be in particular despair
about it, just when, it is most probable, that papa would give his
consent. So, I suppose, I must have been mistaken.”
Frances had had a thousand things to tell her sister about her new old
acquaintance, Beaumont; but the melancholy subject they had been just
discussing, and Julia’s tearful countenance, made her think it all such
nonsense, that she determined not even to mention the subject.
CHAPTER XVII.
… “Why,
Did I look upon her fatal beauty!”
We said, that one of our hero’s appellations, was still Edmund. Written
at full length, his names and titles are, Edmund-Oscar, Ormond, Earl
Fitz-Ullin. As an infant, previous to his being stolen from home, he had
always been called Edmund, to please his mother, from whose father he
derived that name; but, after that Lady’s death, and the second marriage
of the Earl, it became the custom of the family, to call the nurse’s boy,
(who then filled the place of the stolen child,) by the name of Oscar,
one to which Lord Fitz-Ullin was partial, as having been frequently borne
by the representatives of the title.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account