look upon in the light of 'discoveries' are merely rediscoveries, which,
following the law of gradual progress, you make more perfect, yet in
enunciating, you are not the first to explain them." We learn more
easily that which we have heard about, or learnt in childhood. If, as
averred, the Western nations have separated themselves from the great
Aryan stock, it becomes evident that the races that first peopled Europe
were inferior to the root-race which had the Vedas and the pre-historic
Rishis. That which your far-distant forefathers had heard in the
secrecy of the temples was not lost. It reached their posterity, which
is now simply improving upon details.
Question IV.--Is the Moon immersed in matter?
No "Adept," so far as the writers know, has ever given to "Lay Chela"
his "views of the moon," for publication. With Selenography, modern
science is far better acquainted than any humble Asiatic ascetic may
ever hope to become. It is to be feared the speculations on pp. 104 and
105 of "Esoteric Buddhism," besides being hazy, are somewhat premature.
Therefore, it may be as well to pass on to--
Question V.--About the mineral monad.
Any English expression that correctly translates the idea given is
"authorized by the Adepts." Why not? The term "monad" applies to the
latent life in the mineral as much as it does to the life in the
vegetable and the animal. The monogenist may take exception to the term
and especially to the idea while the polygenist, unless he be a
corporealist, may not. As to the other class of scientists, they would
take objection to the idea even of a human monad, and call it
"unscientific." What relation does the monad bear to the atom? None
whatever to the atom or molecule as in the scientific conception at
present. It can neither be compared with the microscopic organism
classed once among polygastric infusoria, and now regarded as vegetable
and ranked among algae; nor is it quite the monas of the Peripatetics.
Physically or constitutionally the mineral monad differs, of course,
from that of the human monad, which is neither physical, nor can its
constitution be rendered by chemical symbols and elements. In short,
the mineral monad is one--the higher animal and human monads are
countless. Otherwise, how could one account for and explain
mathematically the evolutionary and spiral progress of the four
kingdoms? The "monad" is the combination of the last two Principles in
man, the 6th and the 7th, and, properly speaking, the term "human monad"
applies only to the Spiritual Soul, not to its highest spiritual
vivifying Principle. But since divorced from the latter the Spiritual
Soul could have no existence, no being, it has thus been called. The
composition (if such a word, which would shock an Asiatic, seems
necessary to help European conception) of Buddhi or the 6th principle is
made up of the essence of what you would call matter (or perchance a
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account