Fletcher of MadeleyMacdonald, Frederic W. (Frederic William)
Religion
Fletcher of Madeley
Macdonald, Frederic W. (Frederic William)
Fletcher, John, 1729-1785
"If it be asked, what secret vice it was that would not
suffer so honest a man as J. J. Rousseau to embrace the
gospel, without searching into the anecdotes of his life, we
may rest satisfied with the discovery he has made of his own
heart in this single sentence: 'What can be more
transporting to a noble soul than the pride of virtue!' Such
was the pride which made him vainly presume that he had
power sufficient to conquer himself, without invoking the
assistance of God; and by which he was encouraged to assert
that the doctrines of the gospel were such as 'no sensible
man could either conceive or admit.'
"There is no species of pride more insolent than that which
gives rise to the following language: 'It is asserted that
"God so loved the world, as to give His only begotten Son,
that whosoever believeth in Him should not perish, but have
everlasting life." These tidings, whether they be true or
false, are highly acceptable to many; but for my own part, I
openly declare that I reject with contempt the idea of such
a favour. I read with attention those writings which tend to
unfold the mysteries of nature, but resolve never to turn
over those authors who vainly attempt to establish the truth
of the gospel. This subject, though it has occupied the
thoughts and engaged the pens of inquiring students for
these seventeen hundred years, I shall ever regard as
unworthy my attention. I leave it to the vulgar, who are
easily persuaded of its importance. My virtues are
sufficient to expiate my crimes, and on these I will
resolutely depend, as my sole mediators before God.' ...
"The deists of Socrates' time must have been far less
culpable than those of the present day. The former,
conscious of the uncertainty with which they were
encompassed, made use of every help they could procure in
the pursuit of truth with unwearied assiduity. The latter,
presuming upon their own sufficiency, decide against
doctrines of the utmost importance without impartially
considering the evidence produced in their favour. The
former, by carefully examining every system of morality
proposed to their deliberation, discovered a candour and
liberality becoming those who were anxiously 'feeling after
God, if haply they might find Him.' The latter, by
condemning revelation without calmly attending to the
arguments of its advocates, manifest a degree of prejudice
that would be unpardonable in a judge, but which becomes
inexcusable in a criminal, who is pressed by the strongest
reasons to search out the truth."
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account