Flint's Letters from America, 1818-1820Flint, James, active 19th century
History
Flint's Letters from America, 1818-1820
Flint, James, active 19th century
Ohio River Valley -- Description and travel; United States -- Description and travel
The western part has two great navigable streams, the Wabash, and
the Illinois. The Wabash is navigable for boats drawing three feet
of water, to the distance of about 400 miles from its mouth, and in
floods about 200 miles farther. Its largest tributary is White River,
which is navigable to a great distance upward. It waters a fertile
and delightful country, and joins the Wabash below all its rapids
except one run, which forms no great obstruction to the navigation.
The new seat of government is to be erected on the bank of one of
the streams of White River.[100] The Illinois is esteemed one of the
best navigations in western America. So early as 1773, a Mr. Kennedy
sailed upward to the distance of 268 miles from its confluence with the
Mississippi.[101] Sangamon river, one {164} of its principal streams,
is said to be navigable for 180 miles by small craft.
From the best information that I can procure, this western division of
the country, north of the Ohio, appears to be highly eligible to new
settlers. It unites the advantages of having high lands and navigable
waters in immediate contact, and a shorter and a better communication
with the ocean than any part of western America, that is to be
exclusively cultivated by freemen.
The country on Missouri river, has been already noticed as possessing
advantages in soil and climate, but the difficulty of the navigation
upward, amounts to a considerable objection against adopting that
territory. A convention of the people formed a constitution, and laid
before Congress their claim for being admitted as a State in the
Federal Union. The new constitution asserts the right of the people
to hold slaves, and of admitting more negroes from other parts of
the United States. Towards the conclusion of last Session of the
legislature, this question of right was warmly discussed, most of
the members from the Southern States maintained, that Congress have
no right to dictate to the people of any new State on this subject,
viewing it as a matter of internal policy, and one that does not
come under the jurisdiction of the general government,--and the
treaty of Session stipulated, that the Spanish colonists remaining
in the country, should retain their former rights and privileges. In
opposition to these doctrines, the members from Northern States argued,
that Congress has a constitutional right to interfere, and urged as a
precedent, the act prohibiting the introduction of slavery into the
country north-west of Ohio river, with other arguments too numerous
to be recapitulated here. It is painful {165} to learn that the
representatives of the nation are so much divided on this interesting
question, and, in the present instance, to reflect, that in most cases
their proceedings are expressions of the will of their constituents.
The affair waits the decision of next Session, and, in the meantime,
much solicitude prevails with regard to it. The most intelligent
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account