Evatt, G. J. H. (George Joseph Hamilton), 1843-1921; Nightingale, Florence, 1820-1910
“But great would be the mistake of any chronicler fancying
that the advantage our country derived from womanly aid was
only an accession of nurses; for, if gifted with the power
to comfort and soothe, woman also—a still higher gift—can
impel, can disturb, can destroy pernicious content; and when
she came to the rescue in an hour of gloom and adversity,
she brought to her self-imposed task that forethought, that
agile brain power, that organizing and governing faculty of
which our country had need. The males at that time in England
were already giving proofs of the lameness in the use of
brain power, which afterwards became more distinct. Owing,
possibly, to their habits of industry, applied in fixed, stated
directions, they had lost that command of brain force which
kindles ‘initiative,’ and with it, of course, the faculty of
opportunely resorting to any very new ways of action. They
proved slow to see and to meet the fresh exigencies occasioned
by war, when approaching, or even by war when present; and,
apparently, in the hospital problem, they must have gone on
failing and failing indefinitely, if they had not undergone the
propulsion of the quicker—the woman’s—brain to ‘set them going’
in time.”
He then goes on to tell of the arrival at “the immense Barrack Hospital”
at Scutari of Miss Nightingale and her chosen band. “If,” he says, “the
generous women thus sacrificing themselves were all alike in devotion
to their sacred cause, there was one of them—the Lady-in-Chief—who not
only came armed with the special experience needed, but also was clearly
transcendent in that subtle quality which gives to one human being a
power of command over others. Of slender, delicate form, engaging,
highly-bred, and in council a rapt, careful listener, so long as others
were speaking; and strongly, though gently, persuasive whenever speaking
herself, the Lady-in-Chief, the Lady Florence, Miss Nightingale, gave her
heart to this enterprise in a spirit of absolute devotion; but her sway
was not quite of the kind that many in England imagined.”
No, indeed! Sentimentalists who talk as though she had been cast in the
conventional mould of mere yielding amiability, do not realize what she
had to do, nor with what fearless, unflinching force she went straight
to her mark, not heeding what was thought of herself, overlooking the
necessary wounds she must give to fools, caring only that the difficult
duty should be done, the wholesale agony be lessened, the filth and
disorder be swept away.
Her sweetness was the sweetness of strength, not weakness, and was
reserved not for the careless, the stupid, the self-satisfied, but for
the men whose festering wounds and corrupting gangrene were suffered in
their country’s pay, and had been increased by the heedless muddle of a
careless peace-time and a criminally mismanaged transport service.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account