Footprints of the Red Men: Indian geographical names in the valley of Hudson's river, the valley of the Mohawk, and on the Delaware: their location and the probable meaning of some of them.Ruttenber, Edward Manning
History
Footprints of the Red Men: Indian geographical names in the valley of Hudson's river, the valley of the Mohawk, and on the Delaware: their location and the probable meaning of some of them.
Ruttenber, Edward Manning
Indians of North America -- New York (State); Names, Geographical -- New York (State); Names, Indian -- North America
[FN] "Kit Davits' Kil" or the Rondout was so called from Christopher
Davids, an Englishman, who was first at Fort Orange, and was an
interpreter. He obtained, in 1656, a patent for about sixty-five acres,
described as "Situate about a league (about three miles) inland from
the North River in the Esopus, on the west side of the Great Kil,
opposite to the land of Thomas Chambers, running west and northeast
halfway to a small pond on the border of a valley which divides this
parcel and the land of John de Hulter, deceased." Ensign Smith wrote:
"I came with my men to the second valley on Kit Davietsen's River.. . .
Further up in said valley I crossed the stream and found their house."
(Col. Hist. N. Y., xiii.) Supposed to have been at LeFever's Falls in
Rosendale. (Schoonmaker.)
Frudyachkamik, so written in treaty--deed of 1677 as the name of a place
on the Hudson at the mouth of Esopus (now Saugerties) Creek, is written
Tintiagquanneck in deed of 1767 (Cal. Land Papers, 454), and by the late
John W. Hasbrouck, _Tendeyachameck._ The deed orthography of 1677 is
certainly wrong as there is no sound of F in Algonquian. (See
Kerhonksen.)
* * * * *
{TN} {Unable to locate interlinear references to the following two notes
which appear on this page.}
[FN-1] _Saugerties_ is probably a corruption of Dutch _Zager's Kiltje,_
meaning in English, "Sawyer's little Kill." The original appears first
of record in Kregier's Journal of the Second Esopus War (1663), "They
were at Zager's Kiletje"; "To Sager's little Kill"; "To the Sager's
Killetje." (Col. Hist. N. Y., xiii, 342, 344.) The first corruption of
record also belongs to that period. It was by a Mohawk sachem who
visited Esopus and at a conference converted Zager's Kiltje to
Sagertjen. Some of the local Dutch followed with "de Zaagertje's." Other
corruptions were numerous until the English brought in Saugerties. The
original _Zager,_ however, seems to have held legal place for many
years. In 1683, in a survey of the Meals Patent, covering lands now
included in Saugerties, it is written: "Being part of the land called
Sagers," and in another, "Between Cattskill and Sager's Kill." It is
also of record that a man known by the surname of Zager located on the
stream prior to 1663, obtained a cession of the lands on the kill from
Kaelcop, an Esopus sachem, and later disappeared without perfecting his
title by patent. _Zager_ is now converted to _Sager,_ and in English to
_Sawyer._ The claim that Zager had a sawmill at the mouth of the stream
seems to rest entirely upon his presumed occupation from the meaning of
his name. A sawmill here, in 1663, would seem to have been a useless
venture. In 1750, ninety years later, one Burregan had a mill at the
mouth of the kill. "Burregan" stands for Burhans.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account