For whose sake?: A sequel to "Why did he wed her?"Southworth, Emma Dorothy Eliza Nevitte
General
For whose sake?: A sequel to "Why did he wed her?"
Southworth, Emma Dorothy Eliza Nevitte
Bigamy -- Fiction; England -- Fiction; Impostors and imposture -- Fiction
“This,” he said, as he laid it on the table and turned over the leaves,
“is the last year’s edition of ‘Burke’s Landed Gentry of Great Britain
and Ireland.’”
“Well?” carelessly inquired Ran.
“And this,” continued the lawyer, as he paused at an open page, “is the
genealogy of the Hays, of Haymore.”
“Well?” again inquired Ran.
“I want you to look at it with me. I don’t wish to bore you to go over
the whole history, with its marriages, births and deaths, but only to
notice this fact that runs through the whole, from your first known
ancestor, Arthur Hei, who married Edda, a daughter of Seebold, Earl of
Northumberland, down to your grandfather, the late squire, who married
Gentil, daughter of Pharoah Cooper, of Esling. Moor, Yorkshire.”
“She was a gypsy, and the child of a gypsy,” said Ran.
“Yes; still she is set down here as the daughter of a certain somebody.
All your ‘forebyes’ have married the daughters of certain somebodies,
from dukes down to gypsies.”
“Well, but what does all this talk tend to?” demanded Ran.
“To this: It is too late for your name as Squire of Haymore to appear in
this year’s edition of the ‘Landed Gentry’; the volume is probably
already issued. But before long the _Herald College_ will be getting up
next year’s edition, and you will receive letters or messengers
inquiring for authentic statistics concerning your succession, marriage
and so on.”
“Well, they can have them,” said Ran indifferently.
“Yes, but I am afraid there will be some awkwardness for you on one
point.”
“Which point?”
“That of your marriage.”
“How should that be?”
“Why, in this way—listen. The items of entry in your case will be
something like this:
“‘Hay, Randolph; born July 15, 184—; succeeded his grandfather as tenth
squire, March 1, 186—,’ (for you know that your succession will date
from the day of his death); ‘married December 2, 186—, Judith, daughter
of ——’ Whom? There’s where the awkwardness would come in.”
“I would say simply—Judith Man,” replied Ran Hay.
“Very well—Judith Man, daughter of—whom? The _Herald’s College_ are very
precise in these matters. You will have to find a father for her.”
“Mr. Walling! If you were not my friend and my guest, I should be very
angry with you. My sweet wife is a child of the Heavenly Father! but for
an earthly parent of either sex I do not know where to look.”
“Look here then, Hay, to me. I didn’t mention the difficulty without
having a remedy for it. I am a childless widower, as you know. And
though it would be straining a point of probability to represent a man
of thirty-seven as the lawful father of a woman of nineteen, still I
would like to adopt your wife as my daughter, that she may be entered in
the Red Book as Judith, daughter of William Walling, Esq.,
attorney-at-law, New York City. Come, Hay, my friend, you know I mean
the best by you and by her. Now what do you say to accepting me as your
father-in-law?” inquired Will Walling, with a laugh.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account