Forerunners and rivals of Christianity : $b being studies in religious history from 330 B.C. to 330 A.D., Vol. 2 (of 2)Legge, Francis
Religion
Forerunners and rivals of Christianity : $b being studies in religious history from 330 B.C. to 330 A.D., Vol. 2 (of 2)
Legge, Francis
Christianity and other religions; Religions
3. Our own ordered world or Cosmos created by the Demiurge but ruled by
the Devil.
4. Chaos or unarranged Matter ruled by Beelzebub, Prince of the Demons.
Much of this may be due to the desire apparently inborn in natives of
Egypt to define with excessive minuteness the topography of the
invisible world; but the disposition of these different Rulers was by no
means a matter of indifference to mankind. The Demiurge, as in the
Ophite system, was not, indeed, bad, but foolish and blind, not knowing
what he did, nor why he created man. Yet it is he who sends forth the
souls of men which reach them at their birth and leave them at their
death. Hence, says Hippolytus, he is called Psyche or Soul as Sophia is
called Pneuma or Spirit. But this soul of man is little else than what
we call the life, and here as in all else the Demiurge is controlled
without knowing it by his mother Sophia, who from her place in the
Heavenly Jerusalem directs his operations. The bodies of men the
Demiurge makes from that hylic and diabolic substance which is
matter[385], and the soul which comes from him dwells within it as in an
inn, into which all may enter. Sometimes, says Valentinus—and in this
instance at least we know it is he, not one of his followers, who is
speaking—the soul dwells alone and sometimes with demons, but sometimes
with Logoi or “words,” who are heavenly angels sent by Sophia Without
and her spouse the Joint Fruit of the Pleroma into this world, and who
dwell with the soul in the earthly body, when it has no demons living
with it.[386] After leaving the body of matter, the soul will even be
united with its especial angel in a still more perfect manner, as is a
bridegroom with his bride[387], a state which is sometimes spoken of as
“the Banquet,” and seems connected with what has been said above about
the meeting of Jesus the Joint Fruit with the Sophia Without[388]. Yet
this is not a question of conduct or free will, but of predestination,
and seems to mark the chief practical difference between Valentinus on
the one hand and the Ophites and the pre-Christian Gnostics on the
other. The Ophites, as we have seen, believed in the threefold nature of
the soul, or its composition from the pneumatic or spiritual, the
psychical or animal, and the choic or earthly, all which elements were
thought to be present in everyone. But they held, following their
predecessors the Orphici, that these divisions corresponded to what may
be called degrees of grace, and that it was possible for man to pass
from one category to the other, and become wholly pneumatic or psychic
or earthly. Valentinus, however, introduces a different idea and makes
the distinction between the three different categories of human souls
one not of degree, but of essence[389]. Men have not a threefold soul,
but belong to one of three classes, according to the source of their
souls. Either they are pneumatic, _i.e._ spiritual, belonging wholly to
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account