Irenaeus, Bk I. c. 19, § 1, p. 199, Harvey. For the name Abraxas see _ibid._ p. 203, and Hippolytus, _op. cit._ Bk VII. c. 26, p. 361, Cruice. As Harvey points out in his note, the passage containing it has evidently slipped out of Irenaeus’ text and has been added at the foot of the roll. Footnote 308: Hippolytus, _op. cit._ Bk VII. c. 20, p. 344, Cruice. The revelations in question must therefore have been made after the Resurrection. Clement of Alexandria says that Basilides was a disciple of Glaucias, the interpreter of Peter: _Strom._ Bk VII. c. 17. Footnote 309: Hippolytus, _op. cit._ Bk VII. c. 21, pp. 345, 346, Cruice. Footnote 310: ἀθελήτως καὶ ἀνοήτως καὶ ἀναισθήτως. Hippolytus, _loc. cit._ This στίγμα ἀμέριστον or “indivisible point” from which all things come is mentioned in Simon Magus’ Apophasis (see Chapter VI, vol. I. p. 194, _supra_) as well as in the Bruce Papyrus of Chapter X, _infra_. Footnote 311: Or like the Orphic egg from which Phanes came forth. See Chapter IV, vol. I. p. 123, _supra_. Footnote 312: Ἦν, φησίν, ἐν αὐτῷ τῷ σπέρματι Υἱότης, τριμερὴς κατὰ πάντα, τῷ οὐκ ὄντι θεῷ ὁμοούσιος, γενητὴ ἐξ οὐκ ὄντων, Hippolytus, _op. cit_, Bk VII. c. 22, p. 349, Cruice. If these are Basilides’ actual words, he would seem to have been the first author to make use of the expression Homoousios. Footnote 313: Hippolytus, _op. et loc. cit._ p. 350, Cruice. Footnote 314: Ἔχειν μὲν αὐτὸ μετ’ αὐτῆς οὐκ ἠδύνατο· ἦν γὰρ οὐχ ὀμοούσιον· οὐδὲ φύσιν εἶχε μετὰ τῆς Υἱότητος. Hippolytus, _op. et loc. cit._ p. 351, Cruice. Footnote 315: Had Basilides or Hippolytus read Horace? Footnote 316: Hippolytus, _op. cit._ Bk VII. c. 23, p. 353, Cruice. Footnote 317: Amélineau, _Le Gnosticisme Égyptien_, pp. 139-152. So Mallet, _Culte de Neith à Sais_, Paris, 1888, pp. 213, 214, says that both Basilides and Valentinus drew their doctrines from the late form of Egyptian religion which he describes. Footnote 318: _Paut neteru._ Maspero, _Études Égyptol._, II. pp. 244, 245. Cf. the whole of the luminous essay _Sur l’Ennéade_ in the same volume and especially pp. 385, 386. Cf. Naville, _Old Egyptian Faith_, p. 117; Erman, _Hist. Egyptian Religion_, p. 78. Footnote 319: _Tu enim, aiunt, omnes cognosce, te autem nemo cognoscat.... Non autem multos scire posse haec, sed unum a mille, et duo a myriadibus._ Irenaeus, Bk I. c. 19, § 3, p. 202, Harvey. Epiphanius, _Haer._ XXIV. c. 5, p. 152, Oehler, while copying Irenaeus’ account puts it rather differently, Ὑμεῖς πάντα γινώσκετε, ὑμᾶς δὲ μηδεὶς γινωσκέτω, which probably represents Irenaeus’ own expression. One of the authors of the _Pistis Sophia_ had evidently heard of Basilides’ remark about 1 in 1000. Cf. _Pistis Sophia_, p. 354, Copt. Footnote 320: