Forerunners and rivals of Christianity : $b being studies in religious history from 330 B.C. to 330 A.D., Vol. 2 (of 2)Legge, Francis
Religion
Forerunners and rivals of Christianity : $b being studies in religious history from 330 B.C. to 330 A.D., Vol. 2 (of 2)
Legge, Francis
Christianity and other religions; Religions
The Marcionites
were allowed neither to drink wine nor to eat flesh, and those believers
in their tenets who were married had either to separate from their wives
or to remain among the catechumens until about to die, it being unlawful
for them to receive baptism save on their deathbeds[707].
Marcion’s, indeed, seems to have been one of those ruggedly logical and
uncompromising natures, not to be led away by reverence for authority or
tradition, which appear once or twice in the history of most religions;
and it is doubtless this quality which has led Prof. Harnack, as did
Neander in the last century, to claim him as the first reformer of the
Catholic Church[708]. Like another Luther, Marcion declared that the
Church had become corrupted by the additions made by men to the pure
teaching she had received from her Founder, and that only in return to
her primitive faith was safety to be found. For this primitive faith, he
appealed, like the makers of the German Reformation, to the words of
Scripture, but he differed from them most widely in the limitations that
he placed upon them. It was, he declared, impossible to find any
attributes in common between the God of the Old Testament and the
Supreme (and benevolent) Being of whom Jesus announced Himself the Son,
and he therefore rejected the Old Testament entirely. In the same way,
he said that the Canonical Gospels then received among Christians had
become overlaid with Jewish elements introduced by the Asiatic converts
among whom they were first circulated; and that the narrative in the
Gospel according to Luke was alone trustworthy[709]. From this also, he
removed the whole series of traditions concerning the Birth and Infancy
of Jesus; and made it begin in effect with the words of the fourth
chapter in which is described the coming-down of Jesus to “Capernaum, a
city of Galilee.” These he combined with the opening words of Luke iii.,
so that the event was described as taking place in the “fifteenth year
of the reign of Tiberius Caesar[710].” He also excised from the Gospel
everything which could indicate any respect shown by the Founder of
Christianity to the Torah or Law of the Jews, the allusions to the
Jewish traditions concerning Jonah and the Queen of Sheba, the supposed
fulfilment of the Jewish prophecies in the person and acts of Jesus, and
the statement that He took part in the Paschal Feast. He further removed
from it every passage which represents Jesus as drinking wine or taking
part in any festivity, and in the Lord’s Prayer he struck out the
petition for delivery from evil, while modifying the “Hallowed be thy
name!” It has been suggested that in this last case he may have given us
an older version than that of the Canon[711].
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account