Forerunners and rivals of Christianity : $b being studies in religious history from 330 B.C. to 330 A.D., Vol. 2 (of 2)Legge, Francis
Religion
Forerunners and rivals of Christianity : $b being studies in religious history from 330 B.C. to 330 A.D., Vol. 2 (of 2)
Legge, Francis
Christianity and other religions; Religions
Henceforward, the history of the long contest between the two great
empires—“the eyes,” as the Persian ambassador told Galerius, “of the
civilized world[781],” is the record of almost uninterrupted advance on
the part of Persia and of continual retreat on the side of Rome. The
patriotic enthusiasm of a Julian, and the military genius of a
Belisarius, aided by the dynastic revolutions common among Oriental
nations, might for a time arrest the progress of the conquering
Persians; but, bit by bit, the Asiatic provinces slipped out of the
grasp of the European masters of Constantinople. In 603 A.D., it looked
as if Persia were at length in the position to deliver the final blow in
a war which had lasted for more than five centuries. By the invasion of
Chosroes and his successive captures of Antioch, Jerusalem, and Egypt,
it seemed as if the Persians had restored the world-empire of Cambyses
and Darius; but the Persians then discovered, as Xerxes had done a
millennium earlier, how dangerous it is for Orientals, even when flushed
by conquest, to press Europeans too far. The Roman Emperor Heraclius,
who never before or afterwards gave much proof of military or political
capacity, from his besieged capital of Constantinople collected an army
with which he dashed into Persia in a manner worthy of Alexander
himself. After six brilliant campaigns he dictated to the Persians a
triumphant peace in the very heart of their empire[782]. A few years
later, and its shattered and disorganized remains fell an easy prey to
the Mahommedan invaders.
The effect of this long rivalry might have been expected to produce in
the Romans during its continuance a hearty dislike of the customs and
institutions of the nation opposed to them; but almost the exact
contrary was the result. It may be argued that Rome’s proved skill in
government was in no small measure due to her ready adoption of all that
seemed to her admirable in the nations that she overcame. Or it may be
that the influence which the memory of Alexander exercised over all
those who succeeded to his empire led them to imitate him in his
assumption of Persian manners. The fact remains that, long before the
division of the Roman Empire into East and West, the Romans displayed a
taste for Oriental luxury and magnificence which seems entirely at
variance with the simplicity and austerity of the republican conquerors
of Carthage. It is hardly too much to say that while Alexander’s
conscious aim was to make Asia Greek, the Romans, on possessing
themselves of his Asiatic conquests, allowed themselves to become to a
great extent “Medized,” and showed an unexpected admiration for the
habits and culture of Alexander’s Persian subjects.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account