Forerunners and rivals of Christianity : $b being studies in religious history from 330 B.C. to 330 A.D., Vol. 2 (of 2)Legge, Francis
Religion
Forerunners and rivals of Christianity : $b being studies in religious history from 330 B.C. to 330 A.D., Vol. 2 (of 2)
Legge, Francis
Christianity and other religions; Religions
If we now look at the religious literature of the time when the worship
of Mithras was coming into favour, we find a pretty general consensus of
opinion that the chthonian or infernal god represented in the earlier
Persian religion by this Ahriman, was a power who might be the rival of,
but was not necessarily the mortal enemy of Zeus. Whether Neander be
right or not in asserting that the prevailing tendency of the age was
towards Dualism[902], it is certain that most civilized nations had then
come to the conclusion that on this earth the bad is always mixed up
with the good. Plutarch puts this clearly enough when he says that
nature here below comes not from one, but from two opposed principles
and contending powers, and this opinion, he tells us, is a most ancient
one which has come down from expounders of myths (θεολόγοι) and
legislators to poets and philosophers, and is expressed “not in words
and phrases, but in mysteries and sacrifices, and has been found in many
places among both Barbarians and Greeks[903].” The same idea of
antagonistic powers is, of course, put in a much stronger form in the
reformed Persian religion, where the incursion of Ahriman into the
kingdom of Ormuzd brings upon the earth all evil in the shape of winter,
prolonged drought, storms, disease, and beasts and plants hurtful to
man[904]. But this does not seem to have been the view of Ahriman’s
functions taken by the older Magism, whence the worship of Mithras was
probably derived[905]. In Mithraism, it is not Ahriman, as in the
_Bundahish_, but Mithras, the vicegerent of Ormuzd, who slays the mystic
Bull, and by so doing he brings good and not evil to the earth. Nowhere
do we find in the Mithraic sculptures any allusion to Ahriman as a god
of evil pure and simple, or as one who is for ever opposed to the
heavenly powers. We do, indeed, find in several Mithraea representations
of a Titanomachia where the Titans, represented as men with serpent
legs, are depicted as fleeing before a god like the Greek Zeus who
strikes them with his thunderbolts[906]. But this is not more
necessarily suggestive of two irreconcilable principles than the Greek
story of the Titans, those sons of Earth who were persuaded by their
mother to make war upon their father Uranos, who put their brother
Kronos upon his throne, and who were in their turn hurled from heaven by
Kronos’ son Zeus. Even if we do not accept the later myth which
reconciles Zeus to his adversaries[907], the story does not go further
than to say that the Titans attempted to gain heaven and were thrust
back to their own proper dwelling-place, the earth.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account