Forerunners and rivals of Christianity : $b being studies in religious history from 330 B.C. to 330 A.D., Vol. 2 (of 2)Legge, Francis
Religion
Forerunners and rivals of Christianity : $b being studies in religious history from 330 B.C. to 330 A.D., Vol. 2 (of 2)
Legge, Francis
Christianity and other religions; Religions
The Naassene writer says that the peace preached “to those that are
afar off” of Ephesians ii. 17, refers to τοῖς ὑλικοῖς καὶ χοϊκοῖς “to
the material and earthly,” and that “to those that are near” to τοῖς
πνευματικοῖς καὶ νοεροῖς τελείοις ἀνθρώποις “to the spiritual and
understanding perfect men.” Hippolytus, _op. et loc. cit._
Footnote 206:
Hippolytus, _op. cit._ Bk V. c. 8, pp. 172, 173, Cruice.
Footnote 207:
_Cum accepisset concupiscentiam superioris luminis, et virtutem
sumpsisset per omnia, deposuisse corpus et liberatam ab eo._ Irenaeus,
Bk I. c. 28, p. 229, Harvey. As he goes on to say: _Corpus autem hoc
exuisse dicunt eam, foeminam a foemina nominant_, it is plain that he
is here referring to the Third or Lower Sophia who was one of the
personages in the Valentinian drama and unknown, so far as we can
tell, to the Ophites. The Latin translator is no doubt responsible for
this confusion.
Footnote 208:
That this was the object of Ialdabaoth in creating Eve is plain from
Irenaeus’ Latin text (Bk I. c. 28, p. 233, Harvey): _Zelantem autem
Ialdabaoth voluisse excogitare evacuare hominem per foeminam, et de
sua Enthymesi eduxisse foeminam, quam illa Prunicos suscipiens
invisibiliter evacuavit a virtute_. He then goes on to relate the
seduction of the archons which plays so large a part in the Enochian
literature, and which is made Sophia’s contrivance for nullifying the
command to “Increase and multiply” in Genesis.
Footnote 209:
τὰ μικρὰ μυστήρια τὰ τῆς σαρκικῆς γενέσεως: Hippolytus, _op. cit._ Bk
V. c. 8, p. 172, Cruice.
Footnote 210:
Hippolytus, _op. cit._ Bk V. c. 9, p. 177, Cruice.
Footnote 211:
_Ibid._ Bk V. c. 6, p. 140, Cruice.
Footnote 212:
Irenaeus, Bk I. c. 28, § 6, p. 238, Harvey. The section is given
almost word for word as in Irenaeus; but it is manifestly taken from
some other source than that of the Greek text, and is inconsistent
with the rest of the story. If the Lower Sophia or Prunicos (the
Substitute) were born from the mere boiling over of the light shed
upon her mother, of what had she to “repent”? In the _Pistis Sophia_,
indeed, the heroine wins her way back to her former estate by
repentance, but _her_ fall has been occasioned by disobedience and
ambition. So, too, the story about Jesus changing His form on His
descent through the seven heavens is common to the story of Pistis
Sophia and the legend of Simon Magus, which two it therefore connects
(see Chapter VI, vol. I. p. 191, n. 4). It also appears in the
_Ascension of Isaiah_ which Mr Charles thinks may be dated about 150
A.D. (see Charles, _Ascension of Isaiah_, 1900, pp. xi and 62), but
which is probably of much later date. There are other features to be
noted in their place common to the _Pistis Sophia_ and the last named
work.
Footnote 213:
That is to say, that which does not perish and return to the Deity.
Footnote 214:
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account