Forerunners and rivals of Christianity : $b being studies in religious history from 330 B.C. to 330 A.D., Vol. 2 (of 2)Legge, Francis
Religion
Forerunners and rivals of Christianity : $b being studies in religious history from 330 B.C. to 330 A.D., Vol. 2 (of 2)
Legge, Francis
Christianity and other religions; Religions
It was into this atmosphere that Gnosticism entered at least as early as
the reign of Hadrian. Who was answerable for its first introduction
there we have no means of knowing, nor do we even know with any
certainty what form Egyptian Gnosticism first took[302]. One would
imagine that the Hellenizing tendency of the Samaritans might have
brought to Alexandria the doctrines of Simon Magus, but there is no
direct evidence to that effect. The case is different with Antioch,
where one Saturninus or Satornilus—the name is spelt differently by
Irenaeus and Hippolytus—seems to have put forth, at the period referred
to, a _quasi_-Christian system having some likeness to that of the
Ophites, its chief distinguishing feature being its hatred of Judaism
and its God, for whose overthrow it declared Christ to have been
sent[303]. Like the Ophites, Saturninus rigidly opposed the commerce of
the sexes, declaring marriage and generation to be alike the work of
Satan, the declared enemy of the world-creating angels, and of their
leader the God of the Jews[304]. But the followers of this Saturninus
seem to have been few in number, and although all the later
heresiologists preserved the memory of his teaching, it is probable that
the sect itself did not long survive its founder[305]. Basilides, whose
name is associated with that of Saturninus by Irenaeus, Hippolytus, and
Epiphanius, who all make him a fellow disciple with Saturninus of
Menander, the continuator or successor of Simon Magus[306], certainly
flourished under the same reign at Alexandria, where he taught an
extremely complicated doctrine, declaring that between the unknown
Father of All and this world there was interposed a series of 365
heavens corresponding in number to the days of the year, the chief of
them being called Abraxas, the letters of which word have that numerical
value[307]. This is the account of Irenaeus, not materially varied by
any of the other early writers on heresy, with the exception of
Hippolytus, who gives us a long account of the doctrine of Basilides and
his son Isidore, which according to their own account they derived from
Matthias, the Apostle who replaced Judas and who received it secretly
from Jesus Himself[308]. From Hippolytus, we learn that Basilides’
complete or final teaching declared that there was a time when nothing
existed—
“neither matter, nor substance, nor the Unsubstantial, nor simple,
nor compound, nor the Intelligible, nor the Unintelligible, nor that
which can be comprehended by the senses, nor that which cannot be so
comprehended, nor man, nor angel, nor god, nor anything which can be
named”—
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account