Form and Function: A Contribution to the History of Animal MorphologyRussell, E. S. (Edward Stuart)
History
Form and Function: A Contribution to the History of Animal Morphology
Russell, E. S. (Edward Stuart)
Anatomy, Comparative -- History; Morphology (Animals) -- History
[368] In _Grundriss einer Allgemeinen Naturgeschichte der
Radiolarien_, Berlin, 1887, and _Kunstformen der Natur_,
Suppl. Heft, Leipzig.
[369] Haeckel had an intense admiration for Goethe's
morphological work. It is a curious coincidence that the
work of Goethe, Oken and Haeckel was closely associated
with the town of Jena.
[370] But he himself would not admit this! See _Gen.
Morph._, ii., p. 11.
[371] _Fuer Darwin_, 1864. Eng. trans, by Dallas as _Facts
and Arguments for Darwin_, London, 1869.
[372] The bion is the physiological, as the morphon is the
morphological, individual.
[373] See Vogt, _Embryologie des Salmones_, p. 259, 1842,
and _supra_, p. 230.
[374] _An Essay on Classification_, London, 1859.
[375] It was hinted at by Tiedemann. "It is clear that,
proceeding from the earlier to the more recent strata, a
gradation in fossil forms can be established from the
simplest organised animals, the polyps, up to the most
complex, the mammals, and that accordingly the animal
kingdom as a whole has its developmental periods just
like the single individual organism. The species and
genera which have become extinct during the evolutionary
process may be compared with the organs which disappear
during the development of the individual animal" (p. 73,
1808).
[376] _The History of Creation_, vol. i., p. 310, 1876.
Translation of the _Natuerliche
Schoepfungsgeschichte_, 1868.
[377] _Cf._ a parallel passage from Serres, _supra_, p.
82.
[378] _Jenaische Zeitschrift_, ix., pp. 402-508, 1875.
[379] _Loc. cit._, ix., p. 409.
[380] _Untersuchungen zur vergl. Anatomie d.
Wirbelthiere_, Leipzig, i., 1864; ii., 1865; and iii.,
1872.
[381] "U. d. Biologie in Jena waehrend des 19
Jahrhunderts," _Jenaische Zeitschrift_, xxxix., pp.
713-26, 1905.
[382] _Grundriss der vergl. Anatomie_, 1874, 2nd ed.,
1878. Trans. by F. Jeffrey Bell, revised by E. Ray
Lankester, as _Elements of Comparative Anatomy_, London,
1878.
[383] "This theory (evolution) shows that what was
formerly called 'structural plan' or 'type' is the sum
of the dispositions (_Einrichtungen_) of the animal
organisation which are perpetuated by heredity, while it
explains the modifications of these dispositions as
adaptive states. Heredity and adaptation are thus the
two important factors through which both the unity and
the variety of organisation can be understood"
(_Grundzuege_, p. 19).
[384] _History of Creation_, i., pp. 241-2.
[385] "On the use of the term Homology in Modern Zoology,
and the distinction between Homogenetic and Homoplastic
agreements," _Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist._ (4), vi., pp. 35-43,
1870.
CHAPTER XV
EARLY THEORIES ON THE ORIGIN OF VERTEBRATES
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account