Form and Function: A Contribution to the History of Animal MorphologyRussell, E. S. (Edward Stuart)
History
Form and Function: A Contribution to the History of Animal Morphology
Russell, E. S. (Edward Stuart)
Anatomy, Comparative -- History; Morphology (Animals) -- History
[419] _Zeit. f. wiss. Zool._, xx., 1870. For a recent view
of the relation of the Enteropneusta to the Echinoderma,
see J. F. Gemmill, _Phil. Trans._ B., ccv., pp. 213-94,
1914.
[420] In a series of papers published in 1884-6, the
speculative results being discussed in his memoir on
"The Ancestry of the Chordata," _Q.J.M.S._ (n.s.), xxvi.,
pp. 535-71, 1886.
[421] Reprinted in _Zoological Articles_, London, 1891.
[422] "Die Enteropneusten des Golfes von Neapel," _Fauna
und Flora des Golfes von Neapel_, Monog. xviii., Berlin,
1893.
[423] See Macbride, "A Review of Prof. Spengel's Monograph
on Balanoglossus," _Q.J.M.S._, xxxvi., 1894, and "The
Early Development of Amphioxus," _Q.J.M.S._, xl., 1898.
CHAPTER XVI
THE GERM-LAYERS AND EVOLUTION
In his papers of 1866 and 1867 Kowalevsky had remarked upon the
widespread occurrence of a certain type or fundamental plan of early
embryonic development, characterised by the formation, through
invagination, of a two-layered sac, whose cavity became the alimentary
canal. This developmental archetype was manifested in, for instance,
_Sagitta_,[424] _Rana_,[425] _Lymnaea_,[426] _Astacus_,[427]
_Phoronis_,[428] _Asterias_,[429] _Ascidia_,[428] the _Ctenophora_,[428]
and _Amphioxus_.[428] He noticed also that the invagination-opening
often became the definitive anus. Further instances of this mode of
development were later observed by Metschnikoff[430] and by
Kowalevsky[431] himself, but it was left to Haeckel to generalise these
observations and build up from them his famous Gastraea theory. This was
first enunciated in his monograph of the calcareous sponges,[432] and
worked out in detail in a series of papers published in 1874-76.[433]
Haeckel maintained that the "gastrula" stage occurred in the development
of all Metazoa, and that it was typically formed, by invagination, from
a hollow sphere of cells or "blastula." This typical formation might be
masked by cenogenetic modifications caused chiefly by the presence of
yolk. The gastrula stage was the palingenetic repetition of the
ancestral form of all Metazoa, the Gastraea.
From the Gastraea theory there followed at once two consequences, (1)
that ectoderm and endoderm, invagination-cavity (_Urdarm_) and
gastrula-mouth (_Urmund_ or _Protostoma_), were, with all their
derivatives, homologous, because homogenous, throughout the Metazoa, and
(2) that the descent of the Metazoa had been monophyletic, since all
were derived from the ancestral Gastraea. Huxley's suggestion (_supra_,
p. 208) that the outer and inner layers in Coelentera were homologous
with the ectoderm and endoderm of the germ was thus fully confirmed and
greatly extended.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account