Form and Function: A Contribution to the History of Animal MorphologyRussell, E. S. (Edward Stuart)
History
Form and Function: A Contribution to the History of Animal Morphology
Russell, E. S. (Edward Stuart)
Anatomy, Comparative -- History; Morphology (Animals) -- History
[433] "Die Gastraea-Theorie, die phylogenetische
Classification des Thierreichs und die Homologie der
Keimblaetter." _Jenaische Zeitschrift_, viii., pp. 1-55,
1874. "Die Gastrula und die Eifurchung der Thiere,"
_ibid._, ix., pp. 402-508, 1875. "Die Physemarien,
Gastraeaden der Gegenwart," and "Nachtraege zur
Gastraea-Theorie," _ibid._, x., pp. 55-98, 1876.
Republished in _Biologische Studien_, 2nd part, _Studien
zur Gastraea-Theorie_, 270 pp., 14 pls., Jena, 1877.
[434] See _Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist._ (4), xi., p. 253.
[435] Term first introduced in _Die Kalkschwaemme_, p. 468,
1872.
[436] "On the Primitive Cell-layers of the Embryo as the
Basis of Genealogical Classification of Animals, and on
the Origin of Vascular and Lymph Systems," _Ann. Mag.
Nat. Hist._ (4), xi., pp. 321-38, 1873.
[437] First distinguished in _Die Kalkschwaemme_, i., p.
465.
[438] Even in the 'seventies it was still believed by many
that the egg-nucleus disappeared on fertilisation. The
true nature of the process was not fully made out till
1875, when O. Hertwig observed the fusion of egg- and
sperm-nuclei in _Toxopneustes (Morph. Jahrb._, i.,
1876).
[439] _Studien z. Gastraea-Theorie_, p. 214, 1877. These
forms were known even in 1870 (Carter, _Ann. Mag. Nat.
Hist._ (4), vi., pp. 346-7), to be Foraminifera. The
figures of supposed collar-cells, etc., do credit to
Haeckel's imagination.
[440] _History of Creation_, Eng. Trans., ii., pp. 278 ff.
[441] _Systematische Phylogenie_, iii., p. 41, Berlin,
1895.
[442] "Notes on the Embryology and Classification of the
Animal Kingdom," _Q.J.M.S._ (n.s.), xvii., pp. 399-454,
1877.
[443] It was "part of the non-historic mechanism of
growth" (_loc. cit._, p. 418).
[444] _Treatise on Comparative Embryology_, ii., chap.
xiii., 1881. For a modern discussion of this problem,
see Hubrecht, _Q.J.M.S._, xlix., 1906.
[445] See Balfour, _loc. cit._, Chapter xiii.
[446] _A Treatise on Zoology_, Pt. ii., 1900. Introduction
by Sir E. Ray Lankester.
[447] _Studien zur Blaettertheorie_, Jena, 1879-80. "Die
Coelomtheorie, Versuch einer Erklaerung des mittleren
Keimblattes," _Jenaische Zeitschrift_, xv., pp. 1-150,
1882.
[448] For an historical account of this work, see
Lankester, _loc. cit._, pp. 21-37.
[449] _Proc. Roy. Soc._, 1883, and _Q.J.M.S._, xxiii.,
1883.
[450] "Origin of Metameric Segmentation," _Q.J.M.S._,
xxiv., pp. 43-82 1884.
[451] See further the same author's article "Embryology"
in the _Ency. Brit._, vol. xi., 11th ed., Cambridge,
1910.
[452] _Arch. f. mikr. Anat._, xiii., pp. 181-204, 1877.
[453] "Der Bau von Gunda segmentata," _Mitth. Zool. Stat.
Neap._, iii., pp. 187-250, 1882.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account